L. Camille Hébert, B.A., J.D.
Education and Experience
- BA, Kansas State University, Philosophy and Political Science, 1979
- JD, University of Kansas, 1982
Biography
In law school, Professor Hébert served as editor-in-chief of the Kansas Law Review and was elected to Order of the Coif. Following graduation from law school, she clerked for Judge James K. Logan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and practiced labor and employment law, representing management, for five years with Spencer, Fane, Britt, and Browne in Kansas City, Mo.
Professor Hébert has published a number of law review articles on employment discrimination, including pregnancy discrimination and sexual harassment, and employee privacy. She has also conducted research and published articles on comparative sexual harassment law, focusing on French and Canadian law. Her treatise Employee Privacy Law was published in 1993 and is supplemented annually.
Professor Hébert makes frequent presentations to academic and professional audiences on issues of sexual harassment and employee privacy, including genetic testing and electronic surveillance. Professor Hébert served as Chair of the Employment Discrimination Section of the Association of American Law Schools in 1998.
Professor Hébert joined the faculty of the College of Law in 1988. From 1997 to 2000, Professor Hébert served as associate dean for academic affairs at the Moritz College of Law. Professor Hébert is a member of the Associated Graduate Faculty of the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Ohio State. Professor Hébert’s courses include Employment Discrimination Law, Employment Law, Employee Benefits, Labor Law, and a Sexual Harassment seminar. She has also taught Comparative Employment Discrimination and Comparative Dispute Resolution in study abroad programs, including Moritz’s Oxford summer program.
Is Title VII a “Civility Code” Only for Union Activities?, 45 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 1 (2022)
Links: SSRN
How the “MeToo” Movement is Reshaping Workplace Harassment Law in the United States, in Violence(s) et Relations de Travail, Liber Amicorum en Homage à Sandrine Laviolette (P. Auvergnon & B. Lavaud-Legendre eds., 2022).
Links: SSRN
How Sexual Harassment Law Failed its Feminist Roots, 22 Geo. J. Gender & L. 57 (2021)
Links: SSRN
Labor and Employment Rights in the United States: Down a Different Rabbit Hole, 48 Capital U. L. Rev 521 (2021)
Links: SSRN
Commentary on Guthrie v. Conroy, in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Torts Opinions (Martha Chamallas & Lucinda M. Finley eds., 2020).
Is “MeToo” Only a Social Movement or a Legal Movement Too?, 22 Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y 321 (2018)
Links: SSRN
Dignity and Discrimination in Sexual Harassment Law: A French Case Study, 25 Wash. & Lee J. Civ. Rts. & Soc. Just. 3 (2018)
Links: SSRN
Protections from Workplace Bullying and Psychological Harassment in the United States: A Problem in Search of a Cause of Action, in Psychosocial Risks in Labour and Social Security Law : A Comparative Legal Overview from Europe, North America, Australia and Japan (Loïc Lerouge ed., 2017).
Disparate Impact and Pregnancy: Title VII’s Other Accommodation Requirement, 24 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol'y 107 (2015)
Links: SSRN