Consensus Choice Voting Conference
About the Conference
Most voting systems ask which candidate is a voter's favorite. Consensus Choice voting asks a different question: which candidate would a majority prefer over every other candidate on the ballot? Supporters argue that electing the candidate who wins those head-to-head comparisons rewards broad appeal rather than intensity of support, and produces winners who represent more of the electorate. Critics raise questions about tabulation, ballot design, and whether voters would find the method intelligible.
On October 2, Election Law at Ohio State (ELOSU) will convene scholars, researchers, and policymakers at the Moritz College of Law to work through those questions. Panels will take up the democratic theory underlying Consensus Choice voting, how parties and candidates would behave under it, and what the data shows about voter response. A closing panel turns to Ohio Senate Bill 395, which would establish a top-three primary and a head-to-head general election, and what adopting it would require of the state's election officials.
The day will also feature the release of the first national Deliberative Poll on Consensus Choice voting, co-directed by ELOSU and Stanford University's Deliberative Democracy Lab. Unlike a standard survey, the study measures opinion after participants review expert briefing materials and take part in moderated deliberations, which makes it the closest available read on what an informed electorate thinks of the reform.
Conference Agenda
8:30 – 9:00 am: Registration | Saxbe Auditorium
9:00 – 10:00 am: Introductory Conversation with Professors Eric Maskin and Edward Foley
10:00 – 10:15 am: Break
10:15 – 11:30 am: Panel I — How Does Consensus Choice Voting Fit into the Philosophy of Democracy?
Moderator: Steven Huefner, Deputy Director, Election Law at Ohio State
- Thomas Christiano, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Arizona
- Nicholas Stephanopoulos, Kirkland & Ellis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School
- Daniel Wodak, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania
11:30 – 11:45 am: Break
11:45 – 12:45 pm: Panel II — How Would Political Parties Act under Consensus Choice Voting?
Moderator: Anthony Gaughan, Senior Fellow, Election Law at Ohio State
- Scott Ganz, Assistant Professor of Management at UC Riverside School of Business
- Laurel Harbridge-Yong, Professor of Political Science and a Faculty Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University
- Joshua Sellers, Professor of Law at the University of Texas School of Law
12:45 – 1:30 pm: Lunch
1:30 – 3:00 pm: Panel III — Data & Analysis on Voters and Candidates
Moderator: Anne Ralph, Senior Fellow, Election Law at Ohio State
- Assessing Voting Methods Deliberative Poll: Jim Fishkin and Alice Siu
- Public Opinion on Consensus Choice Voting: Natalie Jackson
- Candidate Entry under Consensus Choice and Strategic Voting Research: Maggie Penn
3:00 – 3:15 pm: Break
3:15 – 4:30 pm: Panel IV — Ohio SB 395 (Top 3 Direct Head-to-Head Consensus Election)
Moderator: Terri Enns, Senior Fellow, Election Law at Ohio State
- Sen. Louis Blessing III, Republican member of the Ohio Senate for the 8th district
- Gene Krebs, Co-Chair, Better Choices for Ohio
- Aaron Ockerman, Executive Director, Ohio Association of Election Officials
4:30 – 4:45 pm: Closing Remarks