OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Young v. Hosemann

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: September 12, 2008 / February 25, 2010
State: Mississippi
Issues: Felon Voting Rights, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (Case 3:08-cv-00567); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit (Case 09-60188)

Issue:

Whether the State's refusal to permit convicted felons to vote in presidential elections violates the Mississippi and U.S. Constitutions and the National Voter Registration Act.

Status:

Order Granting Motion to Dismiss entered 3/9/09. Consolidated to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/20/09.   Order Affirming District Court's Dismissal 2/25/10.

Court of Appeals Documents

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

  • Motion filed by Appellant Jerry Young, Appellant Christy Colley for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/10/08)
  • Response/opposition requested by the Court to motion for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/10/08)
  • Response/opposition filed by Appellee Delbert Hosemann to motion for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/14/08)
  • COURT Order filed denying appellants' motion for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/15/08)

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Yes, American democracy is in peril — but don’t blame the bots

A post written by Prof. Edward Foley for SCOTUSblog about Justice Anthony Kennedy’s jurisprudence on voting rights was quoted in Salon.

 

“For Kennedy, freedom comes first and democracy second, and … the purpose of democracy is to preserve and promote personal liberty,” Foley writes. 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Upholds Most Texas Districts in Racial Gerrymandering Case

In a 5-4 decision that reversed the ruling of the District Court, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the drawing of most of the disputed Texas districts did not violate the Constitution or the Voting Rights Act. The case is Abbott v. Perez.

more info & analysis...