OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted

Case Information

Date Filed: May 8, 2015
State: Ohio
Issues: Absentee Ballots, Early Voting, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court Southern District of Ohio (Case 15-cv-01802); Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Case 16-3561); United States Supreme Court (Case 16A-223)

Issue:

Whether Ohio regulations and laws regarding early voting, provisional and absentee ballots, and voter registration violate the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Status:

Complaint filed 5/8/15. Answer filed 6/10/15. Bench trial held November 2015. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed 5/24/16. Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Stay filed 6/9/16. Appellants' Brief filed 6/24/16. Appellees' Brief filed 7/11/16. 6th Circuit Opinion reversing District Court filed 8/23/16. Motion for Stay filed 8/27/16. 6th Circuit Order Denying Stay filed 8/30/16. Emergency Application to Stay 6th Circuit Judgment filed in U.S. Supreme Court 9/1/16. Response in Opposition to Stay filed 9/8/16. Reply in Support of Stay filed 9/12/16. Order Denying Stay Application filed 9/13/16.

 

District Court Documents

 

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Documents

 

U.S. Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Yes, American democracy is in peril — but don’t blame the bots

A post written by Prof. Edward Foley for SCOTUSblog about Justice Anthony Kennedy’s jurisprudence on voting rights was quoted in Salon.

 

“For Kennedy, freedom comes first and democracy second, and … the purpose of democracy is to preserve and promote personal liberty,” Foley writes. 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Upholds Most Texas Districts in Racial Gerrymandering Case

In a 5-4 decision that reversed the ruling of the District Court, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the drawing of most of the disputed Texas districts did not violate the Constitution or the Voting Rights Act. The case is Abbott v. Perez.

more info & analysis...