“Why should this misleading argument be any different from any other misleading argument?” Shane said.
“Historically, (agriculture) is one of the most significant contributors of … conventional pollutants to waterway systems, but now (also) greenhouse gases from a climate-change perspective,” Carlarne said.
“Tax privacy is an important norm to reinforce,” Glogower said. “It needs to be balanced with Congress’s need to do its job.”
“We’re at the stage of marijuana reform 2.0,” Berman said.
“Ultimately the question’s going to be whether the Supreme Court takes a look at its earlier decisions and modifies them in any way that will create breathing room for a law like the heartbeat bill,” Spindelman said.
“To me, the burden is really on the lawyers who select arbitrators,” Cole said. “At the moment of selection, be conscious of the issue.”
“It’s not necessarily inaccurate for Sen. Harris to make this claim, but it is speculative,” Tokaji said.
“I just think the political forces facilitating the status quo are still so strong,” Berman said.
Professor Daniel Tokaji appeared on All Sides with Ann Fisher to discuss U.S. Supreme Court arguments regarding the 2020 census.
“It wouldn’t surprise me at all if these judges realize that the main event is before the Supreme Court and have written this ruling with an eye towards influencing the Supreme Court,” Tokaji said.
“That’s more reasonable than it was five years ago, but it’s not establishing law school as a winning proposition,” Merritt said.
“But while the Ohio decision continues the trend that’s developing in the lower courts, Ned Foley, who heads the election law program at Ohio State University, said he’d be surprised if it alone changed any of the justices’ minds,” Bloomberg Law reports.