Welcome

The Justice for Children Project engages in research and law reform while providing law students with exciting opportunities to explore the legal issues pertaining to children. [Watch a short video on the Justice for Children Project]

Project News

Juvenile Law Symposium to be held April 3-4, 2008
Juvenile law experts will discuss cutting edge issues pertaining to delinquency, abuse, neglect, dependency, and termination of parental rights cases at a two-day symposium on April 3 and 4. The symposium, sponsored and hosted by The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law's Justice for Children Project, will examine several juvenile law topics, such as Senate Bill 10 and the Adam Walsh Act; Blakely and Foster issues in serious youthful offender proceedings; the use of testimonial evidence pursuant to Crawford; how to try an abuse and neglect case; case law and legislation updates; and recent developments in neurological and socioscientific research.

The symposium will be at the Barrister Club, a state-of-the-art facility at the Moritz College of Law. Located in the heart of the University district in downtown Columbus, the Barrister Club is adjacent to the South Campus Gateway, an urban venue that includes markets, shops, restaurants, and a movie theater. A limited number of scholarships are available to public defenders and pro bono counsel.

Symposium Home | Registration

Justice for Children Project Alumni Awarded Equal Justice Works Fellowship
Congratulations to Kristen Henry (Moritz College of Law '07), who has received a fellowship to work with the Equal Justice Foundation to provide representation to the more than 3,000 juveniles incarcerated in Ohio Department of Youth Services prisons each year. Kristen's project will seek to enforce the legal rights of incarcerated juveniles under the No Child Left Behind Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and to address other problems with the conditions of confinement. [Read More about Kristen's Award and Other Alumni Awards]

Justice for Children Practicum Students Argue, Win Termination of Familial Rights Appeal
Justice for Children Practicum students Bridget Purdue and Alicia Zambelli successfully prosecuted an appeal on behalf a minor who opposed the state's attempt to terminate his relationship with father. The students filed a brief and a reply brief in the case, and presented oral argument to the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Tenth District. On April 26, 2007, the court issued an opinion sustaining the first assignment of error raised in the students' brief, vacated the judgment terminating the familial relationship, and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Congratulations to Bridget and Alicia on a job well done!

Ohio Supreme Court Update
On March 29, 2007, the Ohio Supreme Court issued opinions in two child welfare cases, In Re D.A., 113 Ohio St.3d 88, 2007-Ohio-1105, and In Re C.F., 113 Ohio St.3d 73, 2007-Ohio-1104. The Justice for Children Project had previously submitted amicus briefs and arguments in both cases.

In In Re D.A., the Project argued in both an amicus brief and at oral argument that the trial court's "failure to strictly comply with the requirements of R.C. 2151.414 violated the child's rights under the United States and Ohio Constitutions, by terminating parental rights based solely on the mental retardation of the parents." In accordance with this argument, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals, and its opinion concludes that "[w]hen determining the best interest of a child under R.C. 2151.414(D) at a permanent-custody hearing, a trial court may not base its decision solely on the limited cognitive abilities of the parents."

In In Re C.F., the Project contended in an amicus brief and at oral argument in support of the appellee that "[b]ut for a few narrowly defined exceptions, the state must make reasonable efforts to reunify the family prior to the termination of parental rights," and that "[a]s a party, the child has a right to participate in a permanent custody proceeding, and in the absence of a clear and reliable statement of the child's desire to forego participation, the trial court has an obligation to ensure the child's participation." Although the Ohio Supreme Court ultimately rejected the arguments of the appellee in its opinion, that opinion is clearly informed by the arguments raised in the brief and argument presented by the Justice for Children Project. In fact, the Court's decision to modify the first certified question was likely motivated directly by the arguments raised in the Project's amicus brief, since the Court's decision relies in large part on authorities cited only in the Project's brief.

On December 26, 2006, Justice for Children Project staff attorney Jay Macke and Director Katherine Hunt Federle filed a joint amicus brief with the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in the Ohio Supreme Court appeal In Re: Corey Spears, No. 2006-1074. The case addresses waiver of the right to counsel in juvenile delinquency proceedings and the proper interpretation of the Ohio statute governing the juvenile right to counsel.

The Justice for Children Project also recently filed an amicus brief in support of the appellee in the Ohio Supreme Court certified conflict case In Re Beatty, No. 2006-1627. That case involved the following certified question: "Whether a trial court is authorized to grant legal custody to a relative at the center of a permanent custody action where several months prior to the final permanent custody hearing the court determined that the home was appropriate for consideration of relative placement and the DJFS had conducted a home study and facilitated visitation in the home of the relative, when the relative has not filed a motion pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A)(3) requesting custody." On March 7, 2007, in accordance with the arguments of the appellee and the Project, the Court dismissed the case as having been improvidently certified. [Read More on the Amicus Project]

Amicus Project Files Brief in United States Supreme Court
On February 27, 2007, the Justice for Children Project joined the Juvenile Law Center, the Children's Law Center of Minnesota, and almost two dozen other organizations and individuals to file an amicus petition in support of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court appeal Smook v. Minehaha County, No. 06-1034. The petition challenged the Eighth Circuit's decision upholding the constitutionality of a policy requiring strip searches of all juveniles brought to a juvenile detention center for minor delinquency and status offenses. On March 26, 2007, the Supreme Court denied review over the case.

Pro Bono Partnership Begins Training and Accepts First Cases
The Justice for Children Project's Pro Bono Partnership, created through grants from the ABA, the CBF and the Kellogg Foundation, has completed its first training and begun assigning its first cases. The partnership pairs local attorneys who are willing to serve as pro bono guardians ad litem with law students from the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Pro Bono Research Group, who provide the attorneys research, drafting, and other assistance in performing the duties of the guardian ad litem. Attorneys participating in the Pro Bono Partnership can visit this secure page to obtain additional materials related to the project. If you are interested in finding out more information about the Pro Bono Partnership, please feel free to contact us.

[News Archives]