OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Swing State Focus

Election Law @ Moritz is monitoring 2012 election administration issues in key swing states. These issues have potential to impact the outcome of this year's election results. For information on voter ID, absentee and provisional ballots, poll-worker error, recount procedures, and other issues as they arise, click on the individual state links below, or compare states by using the compare menus. Information about individual states will be added as it's available. For additional information about the vote-counting process in these states, including canvassing, recounts, and contests, see Recount Resources.


Election Law @ Moritz Colorado Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz Florida Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz Iowa Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz Nevada Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz New Hampshire Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz Ohio Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz Virginia Swing State Focus
Election Law @ Moritz Wisconsin Swing State Focus





Compare

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Publication of new BALLOT BATTLES book

Edward B. Foley

I'm delighted that Oxford University Press has published my new book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States. I've collected links to last week's blogging related to the book's release. 

more commentary...

In the News

David  Stebenne

Clinton, Sanders and the changing face of the Democratic Party

Professor David Stebenne wrote an op-ed for The Conversation describing how a recent debate between Democratic Party presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders highlighted changes in the Democratic Party over the past half-century.

“Last week’s debate in New Hampshire between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders over who is the “real progressive” said a lot about how they and the Democratic Party have changed over the past half-century,” Stebenne said.

“When Clinton and Sanders first came of age politically during the mid-1960s, neither was a natural fit for the Democrats as the party was then.

“Taking a look at how these two very different people and the party they now want to lead have evolved can help clarify the philosophical divide on display in the Democratic Party today.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

New state voting laws face first presidential election test

more info & analysis...