OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


State-by-State Coverage

Alaska

Complete coverage for Alaska can be found below. (Return to States List)

Information & Analysis

December, 2010

November, 2010

October, 2010

November, 2008

Commentary

2010

News Wire

Election law news from across the country concerning Alaska

July, 2014

June, 2014

May, 2014

January, 2014

November, 2013

October, 2013

September, 2013

August, 2013

July, 2013

June, 2013

April, 2013

August, 2012

June, 2012

January, 2012

June, 2011

April, 2011

February, 2011

January, 2011

December, 2010

November, 2010

March, 2010

January, 2010

November, 2008

Litigation

Active Cases

There are no active cases in Alaska that Election Law @ Moritz is covering at this time.

Archived Cases

[Return to State-by-State Home]

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...