Election: Fall, 2008
Intent standard
Washington law requires that the ballot be marked with sufficient definiteness to determine the voter’s choice or intention. RCW 29A.60.040. This general definition allows for different interpretations among judges but also allows for a greater number of irregularly marked ballots to be counted.
Special Features
Institutional Arrangements
Voter Registration
Challenges
Provisional Ballots
Early and Absentee Voting
Voting Technology
Polling Place Operations
Ballot Security
Emergency Preparedness
Post-Election Processes
Election Law @ Moritz | The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.
PDF files in this site require Adobe Reader to view (link opens in NEW window). If you have trouble accessing this page or need to request an alternate format, please email the Moritz Law Webmaster.