OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Young v. Hosemann

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: September 12, 2008 / February 25, 2010
State: Mississippi
Issues: Felon Voting Rights, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (Case 3:08-cv-00567); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit (Case 09-60188)

Issue:

Whether the State's refusal to permit convicted felons to vote in presidential elections violates the Mississippi and U.S. Constitutions and the National Voter Registration Act.

Status:

Order Granting Motion to Dismiss entered 3/9/09. Consolidated to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/20/09.   Order Affirming District Court's Dismissal 2/25/10.

Court of Appeals Documents

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

  • Motion filed by Appellant Jerry Young, Appellant Christy Colley for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/10/08)
  • Response/opposition requested by the Court to motion for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/10/08)
  • Response/opposition filed by Appellee Delbert Hosemann to motion for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/14/08)
  • COURT Order filed denying appellants' motion for injunction pending appeal (filed 10/15/08)

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of X-Rays, CT Scans, and Gerrymanders

Edward B. Foley

Progress in the detection of malignant redistricting.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Ranked-choice voting: A better way or chaos?

Professor Edward Foley’s book, “Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States” was quoted in The Ellsworth American, in an article about ranked-choice voting in Maine.

Plurality language was added to Maine’s Constitution in 1880 after none of the candidates for governor in the election of 1879 received a majority vote.

“After this ordeal, the state eliminated the requirement that a gubernatorial candidate win a majority in order to win the office outright; instead, a plurality would suffice,” Foley writes.
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Texas\' Request for Stay in Redistricting Case

In two 5-4 votes, the U.S. Supreme Court granted stays in a Texas redistricting case involving Congressional and state house questions, putting on hold the district court\'s orders for the Texas legislature to redraw certain district lines. The stays will be in place until the Supreme Court rules on Texas\' appeal, likely next year. The case is Perez v. Abbott.

more info & analysis...