OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

U.S. v. McGregor et. al.

Case Information

Date Filed: October 4, 2010
State: Alabama
Issue:
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (Case 2:10-cr-00186)

Issue:

Indictment of 11 individuals for allegedly engaging in a “wide ranging conspiracy to buy and sell votes on legislation in Alabama that would directly benefit the business interests of two of the defendants.”

Status:

All Parties Acquitted on some counts 8/12/11. Order Withdrawing as Moot Defendant Gilley's Objection to the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate entered 5/4/11.  US Notice of Supplemental Authority filed 5/6/11.  US Reply in Support of Memorandum to Use Transcripts and Rule of Completeness Objections filed 5/6/11.  Defendant Coker's Notice of Supplemental Authority filed 5/6/11.  Defendant McGegor's Response to Court Order filed 5/6/11. Joint Report on Issues to be Addressed at Pretrial Conference filed 5/11/11. Trial Set to commence 6/6/11.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Anti-Trumpersí Most Futile Effort Yet to Stop Trump from Being Sworn In

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in Law Newz about efforts to persuade Chief Justice John Roberts to decline conducting Donald Trump’s Oath of Office on Inauguration Day. Even though the U.S. Constitution requires the President to take an oath of office, the the Chief Justice is not required to administer it. It is unlikely that such attempts will prevent Trump from being sworn in, Foley said.

“I think the main point is that the oath doesn’t need to be administered by the Chief Justice,” he said. “After Kennedy’s assassination, a federal district judge in Texas administered the oath to Johnson.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal District Court Panel Finds Unconstitutional Gerrymandering in Alabama

In an opinion released today, a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama found unconstitutional gerrymandering in 12 Alabama districts. In a separate concurring and dissenting opinion, one judge on the panel would have found more districts unconstitutionally drawn. The case is Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama.

more info & analysis...