OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Ray v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: November 15, 2008 / November 17, 2008
State: Ohio
Issue: Absentee Ballots
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:08-cv-01086)

Issue:

Whether the Franklin County Board of Elections shall be required (under HAVA, the ADA, and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution) to accomodate disabled voters who are unable to go in person to the Board of Elections to cure alleged defects in their absentee ballots.

Status:

Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed on 11/15/08.  Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction granted on 11/17/08.

U.S. District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Filibusters are not for shutdowns

Edward B. Foley

The minority party must win elections, not derail the government, to prevail on policy.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180207/inside-story-on-ohios-redistricting-deal

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in The Columbus Dispatch about partisan congressional redistricting in Ohio. 

 

 

"I can’t think of anywhere where we’ve had a situation like we’ve had here for the past couple of years,” Tokai said. “People in Ohio’s state legislature recognize there’s a serious problem.”



 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...