OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Ray v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: November 15, 2008 / November 17, 2008
State: Ohio
Issue: Absentee Ballots
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:08-cv-01086)

Issue:

Whether the Franklin County Board of Elections shall be required (under HAVA, the ADA, and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution) to accomodate disabled voters who are unable to go in person to the Board of Elections to cure alleged defects in their absentee ballots.

Status:

Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed on 11/15/08.  Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction granted on 11/17/08.

U.S. District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Tempe City Council Moves Ahead With Ordinance To Limit 'Dark Money'

Professor Edward Foley appeared on KJZZ to discuss an ordinance in Tempe, Arizona that could limit the influence of “dark money” on its municipal elections.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Ohio ADA Case Alleging Discrimination Against Blind Voters

In an opinion released today, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court dismissing a lawsuit alleging that Ohio\'s absentee voter system discriminates against blind voters. According to the panel, the district court accepted Ohio Secretary of State John Husted\'s \"fundamental alteration\" defense without any evidentiary support. The case, Hindel v. Husted, was remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

more info & analysis...