OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted

Case Information

Date Filed: May 8, 2015
State: Ohio
Issues: Absentee Ballots, Early Voting, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court Southern District of Ohio (Case 15-cv-01802); Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Case 16-3561); United States Supreme Court (Case 16A-223)

Issue:

Whether Ohio regulations and laws regarding early voting, provisional and absentee ballots, and voter registration violate the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Status:

Complaint filed 5/8/15. Answer filed 6/10/15. Bench trial held November 2015. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed 5/24/16. Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Stay filed 6/9/16. Appellants' Brief filed 6/24/16. Appellees' Brief filed 7/11/16. 6th Circuit Opinion reversing District Court filed 8/23/16. Motion for Stay filed 8/27/16. 6th Circuit Order Denying Stay filed 8/30/16. Emergency Application to Stay 6th Circuit Judgment filed in U.S. Supreme Court 9/1/16. Response in Opposition to Stay filed 9/8/16. Reply in Support of Stay filed 9/12/16. Order Denying Stay Application filed 9/13/16.

 

District Court Documents

 

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Documents

 

U.S. Supreme Court Documents

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Symposium: Wechsler, history and gerrymandering

A post written by Professor Edward Foley was published on SCOTUSblog.

“When we look back on the half-century since Sullivan, we see a legacy in which the Supreme Court itself contributed to America’s growth as a people committed to political freedom. Sullivan is entrenched as precedent precisely because it is now indelibly part of our national self-understanding," Foley writes. "For Gill to be successful like Sullivan, it too will need to become woven into our sense of America as a democracy. The way for Gill to accomplish this is to declare: 'Although the original Gerry-mander was never tested in this Court, the attack on its validity has carried the day in the court of history.' If the court says this, then 50 years from now—thanks in large part to Gill itself—we may have matured into the genuinely representative democracy we are still striving to be.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider a gerrymandering case involving Wisconsin state legislative districts. The court also granted a request by the state to temporarily block the lower court\'s decision until the appeal is resolved. The case is Gill v. Whitford.

more info & analysis...