OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Minnesota Majority v. Ritchie

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: May 28, 2009 / July 22, 2009
State: Minnesota
Issue: Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: Minnesota Supreme Court (Case A090950)

Issue:

Petitioners allege that the state's voter registration system has not been adequately updated and that vote totals from canvassing boards exceed the stated number of registered voters.

Status:

Petition filed 5/28.  Order dismissing petition for declaratory judgment, 7/22.

Minnesota Supreme Court Documents

Related Articles

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Blocks Enforcement of Ohio Statutes

In an opinion released today, U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley enjoined the enforcement of various statutes amended by the Ohio General Assembly in 2014. The amendments altered certain requirements for absentee and provisional voting. According to Judge Marbley, the amendments violated the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment. The case is NEOCH v. Husted.

more info & analysis...