OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Maletski v. Macomb County Republican Party

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: January 1, 2008 / October 20, 2008
State: Michigan
Issues: Voter Registration, Voter Eligibility
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Case 2:08-cv-13982)

Issue:

Whether an alleged Republican plan to challenge the voting registration of voters who appear on foreclosure lists violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).  The Republicans have denied any plan to engage in the alleged activities.

Status:

Complaint filed on 9/16/08.  Plaintiff filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction on 9/25/08.  Responses and replies have been filed with the court.

District Court Documents

Related Links

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

North Carolina’s disputed race for governor: historical context

Edward B. Foley

Federal courts have a power to protect voting rights that they lacked until recently.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Donald Trump video outlines first 100 day plans

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted on Fox28 about Donald Trump’s latest video outlining plans for his first 100 days in office.

"Take immigration for example, one of the cornerstones of the Trump campaign, not just building the wall, but reversing some of President Obama's actions on immigration, in particular the protection of the immigrant children," Tokaji said. "There will be a big backlash from the growing Latino population if he acts too aggressively on that, something that could hurt the Republican Party for decades."

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Divided District Court Panel Finds Wisconsin Assembly Districts Unconstitutionally Drawn

In a 2-1 opinion, a District Court panel determined that the redistricting plan enacted by the Wisconsin legislature in 2011 was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The court deferred its ruling as to a remedy, ordering further briefing by the parties. The case is Whitford v. Nichol.

more info & analysis...