OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell

Case Information

Date Filed: August 31, 2006
State: Ohio
Issue: Improper Election Administration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:06-cv-00745-ALM-TPK)

Issue:

Whether the rights, privileges, and immunities guaranteed to Plaintiffs by the Civil Rights Act, and the First, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution have been violated by the past and ongoing conduct of Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell in connection with past elections in Ohio.

Status:

Motion for Reconsideration of Opinion and Order filed 12/3/10.  Responses in Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration filed 12/17/10.  Plaintiffs' Replies in Response to Motion for Reconsideration filed 1/3/11.  Notice of Developments in the Northern District of Ohio in Regard to Plaintiff's Proposed Filing filed 1/19/11.  State's Notice Opposing any Discover and Requesting a Status Conference filed 2/8/11.  Plaintiff's Response to Motion Requesting Status Conference filed 2/25/11.  Order Setting Status Conference entered 5/12/11. Plaintiff's Brief on Jurisdisction, Discovery, and Evidence issues filed 7/15/11.  Reply to Plaintiff's Brief on Jurisdisction, Discovery, and Evidence issues filed 8/16/11. Opinion and Order Dismissing Case filed 2/7/12.

Summary

Individual voters and three voters' rights groups sued Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell alleging that Blackwell allocated election resources in a racially discriminatory manner and instituted racially discriminatory procedures for provisional voting, purging voters from the statewide voter registration database, and maintaining the chain of custody of ballots. The complaint alleged that these actions led to the dilution and/or cancellation of plaintiffs' vote due to ballot cancellation and tampering, long poll lines, mechanical difficulties with voting machines, and unclear precinct boundaries. The complaint claims that plaintiffs reasonably fear these problems will recur in the November, 2006, election, and asks the court to appoint a special master to perform Blackwell's election administration duties in that election.

District Court Documents

Related Links

Commentary

Daniel P. Tokaji

Why the Supreme Court Shouldn’t Intervene in Ohio

Daniel P. Tokaji

Briefing is now in the U.S. Supreme Court on Ohio’s emergency motion to stay the district court injunction restoring the rules regarding same day registration and early voting that existed before legislation enacted earlier this year (SB 238). In a previous post, I explained why the district court and Sixth Circuit panel’s rulings were faithful applications of legal precedent requiring close attention to the context in which restrictions on voting are enacted. This post explains why it would be unwise and disruptive for the Supreme Court to change the rules now – now literally on the eve of an election -- responding to comments that my colleague Ned Foley posted yesterday.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Ohio Files Emergency Application for Stay with SCOTUS in Early Voting Case

Today, the state of Ohio filed an emergency application in the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision issued yesterday. That decision affirmed the District Court in blocking an Ohio law reducing the number of days for early voting. The case is NAACP v. Husted.

more info & analysis...