OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Scott v. Schedler

Case Information

Date Filed: April 19, 2011
State: Louisiana
Issues: Voter Registration, Voter Eligibility
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Case 2:11-cv-00926-JTM-JCW); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Case 13-31147); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Case 13-30185)

Issue:

Whether Louisiana has complied with the obligations imposed on states by the federal government in the NVRA.

Status:

Complaint filed 4/19/11. Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Denied 5/3/12. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed 7/3/12. Joint Motion to Continue Trial Date filed 9/26/12. Trial Scheduled for 10/15/12. Permanent Injunction granted 1/23/13. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs filed 2/26/2013. Judgment for Plaintiffs awarding fees and costs filed 10/22/13. Notice of Appeal filed 10/31/13. Defendant's Motion for Stay filed 12/30/13.  Ordering Granting Stay filed 1/2/14. Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Court's Jurisdiction filed 1/17/14. Defendant's Response in Opposition to Motion to Extend Court's Jurisdiction filed 1/22/14. Order Extending Injunction until 2/3/14. Order denying extension of court's jurisdiction filed 2/3/14. Order granting Motion to Stay Pending Appeal filed 5/22/14. 5th Circuit Opinion filed 11/5/14. Mandate issued 2/6/15. Order Amending Permanent Injunction filed on 7/10/15. Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations as to Attorney Fees filed 12/3/15.

 

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents (Merits)

Court of Appeals Documents (Attorney Fees)

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Symposium: Wechsler, history and gerrymandering

A post written by Professor Edward Foley was published on SCOTUSblog.

“When we look back on the half-century since Sullivan, we see a legacy in which the Supreme Court itself contributed to America’s growth as a people committed to political freedom. Sullivan is entrenched as precedent precisely because it is now indelibly part of our national self-understanding," Foley writes. "For Gill to be successful like Sullivan, it too will need to become woven into our sense of America as a democracy. The way for Gill to accomplish this is to declare: 'Although the original Gerry-mander was never tested in this Court, the attack on its validity has carried the day in the court of history.' If the court says this, then 50 years from now—thanks in large part to Gill itself—we may have matured into the genuinely representative democracy we are still striving to be.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider a gerrymandering case involving Wisconsin state legislative districts. The court also granted a request by the state to temporarily block the lower court\'s decision until the appeal is resolved. The case is Gill v. Whitford.

more info & analysis...