OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Daien v. Ysursa

Case Information

Date Filed: January 21, 2009
State: Idaho
Issue: Ballot Access
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho (Case 1:09-cv-00022)

Issue:

Whether Idaho laws on ballot access are in violation of the 1st and 14th Amendments in their application to independent candidates.

Status:

Order denying Defendant's motion and granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment entered 4/19/10.  Judgment in accordance with the Memorandum Decision and Order entered 5/5/10.  Motion for Attorney's Fees filed 6/18/10.

Federal District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Tempe City Council Moves Ahead With Ordinance To Limit 'Dark Money'

Professor Edward Foley appeared on KJZZ to discuss an ordinance in Tempe, Arizona that could limit the influence of “dark money” on its municipal elections.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Ohio ADA Case Alleging Discrimination Against Blind Voters

In an opinion released today, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court dismissing a lawsuit alleging that Ohio\'s absentee voter system discriminates against blind voters. According to the panel, the district court accepted Ohio Secretary of State John Husted\'s \"fundamental alteration\" defense without any evidentiary support. The case, Hindel v. Husted, was remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

more info & analysis...