OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Daien v. Ysursa

Case Information

Date Filed: January 21, 2009
State: Idaho
Issue: Ballot Access
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho (Case 1:09-cv-00022)

Issue:

Whether Idaho laws on ballot access are in violation of the 1st and 14th Amendments in their application to independent candidates.

Status:

Order denying Defendant's motion and granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment entered 4/19/10.  Judgment in accordance with the Memorandum Decision and Order entered 5/5/10.  Motion for Attorney's Fees filed 6/18/10.

Federal District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Publication of new BALLOT BATTLES book

Edward B. Foley

I'm delighted that Oxford University Press has published my new book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States. I've collected links to last week's blogging related to the book's release. 

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

What would it take to find out for sure if Ted Cruz (or others like him) is eligible for the presidency?

Professor Daniel P. Tokaji's research was quoted in a Washington Post article:

The most common route for aggrieved partisans, in this case opponents of Cruz, are the federal courts. But the courts are unlikely to go near the question just because someone brings a lawsuit. If some gadfly, for example, were to sue in federal court to keep Cruz off the ballot, the chances of any judge stepping in to settle the question is close to zero. 

There’s little dispute about that according to, among many others, Ohio State University law professor Daniel P. Tokaji, writing in the Michigan Law Review.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

New state voting laws face first presidential election test

more info & analysis...