OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

NAACP v. Billups

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: September 19, 2005 / June 8, 2009
State: Georgia
Issue: Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia (Rome) (Case 4:05-cv-00201-HLM); U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit (Case 05-15784, 06-11927, 07-14664, 08-10432); U.S. Supreme Court (Case 08-1231)

Issue:

Whether Georgia's Voter ID Statue, which requires a state-issued photo ID, is unconstitutional or violative of the federal Voting Rights Act.

Status:

11th Circuit opinion vacating, rendering and affirming entered 1/14. Motion to Stay Mandate filed 2/10.  Petition for Writ of Cert filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on 4/1.  Brief in Opposition filed 5/6. Reply Brief filed 5/19.  Petition denied on 6/8.

Summary: Read Detailed Summary

U.S. Supreme Court Documents

U.S. Court of Appeals Documents

District Court Documents

Related Cases

Related Links

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Missing Link in Gerrymandering Jurisprudence

Edward B. Foley

The key advance is the ability to identify whether a redistricting map is an extreme outlier in the degree of its partisan bias.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

A path through the thicket the First Amendment right of association

A post written by Professor Dan Tokaji for SCOTUSblog during their Summer Symposium on Gill v. Whitford was reprinted on ACSblog.

“A constitutional standard for partisan gerrymandering is the holy grail of election law. For decades, scholars and jurists have struggled to find a manageable standard for claims of excessive partisanship in drawing district lines," Tokaji writes. "Most of these efforts have focused on the equal protection clause. But as Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested in Vieth v. Jubelirer, the First Amendment provides a firmer doctrinal basis for challenging partisan gerrymandering.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Texas\' Request for Stay in Redistricting Case

In two 5-4 votes, the U.S. Supreme Court granted stays in a Texas redistricting case involving Congressional and state house questions, putting on hold the district court\'s orders for the Texas legislature to redraw certain district lines. The stays will be in place until the Supreme Court rules on Texas\' appeal, likely next year. The case is Perez v. Abbott.

more info & analysis...