OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Fair Elections Ohio, The Amos Project, et al v. Husted

Case Information

Date Filed: October 15, 2012
State: Ohio
Issue: Absentee Ballots
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 1:12-cv-00797-SJD); Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Case 14-4007)

Issue:

Whether it is constitutional for Ohio to fail to make provisions for persons arrested after the absentee ballot deadline (the Saturday before the election at noon) to vote from jail.

Status:

Complaint filed 10/15/12. First-amended complaint filed 10/18/12. Hearing on motion for Temporary Restraining Order set for 10/23/12. Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order denied 11/1/12. Answer filed 11/6/12. Joint Discovery Plan filed 12/28/12. Preliminary Pretrial Order filed 1/16/13. Answer of Defendant Preisse filed 1/22/13. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/14. Emergency Motion to Exclude Defendants Jon Husted and Attorney General Mike DeWine filed 2/28/14. Order denying motion to exclude filed 3/4/14. Defendant and Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed 6/5/14. Defendant and Plaintiffs' Replies to Motion for Summary Judgment filed 6/30/14. Defendant's Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment filed 7/14/14. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment filed 7/15/14. Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 9/16/14. Defendant's Notice of Appeal filed 10/15/14. Opinion finding lack of standing filed 10/24/14. Order dismissing case filed 11/20/14.

 

Circuit Court of Appeals Documents

District Court Documents

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Gerrymandering Is Headed Back to the Supreme Court

Professor Edward Foley was requoted in Mother Jones about a gerrymandering case in Wisconsin on its way to the Supreme Court. Other legal actions on partisan gerrymandering in Maryland and in North Carolina may be bound for the Supreme Court as well.

While previous Supreme Court cases have noted that partisan gerrymanders are “incompatible with democratic principles,” The New York Times originally reported, the court has never officially struck a case down. While it remains unseen how the Supreme Court will rule in the upcoming cases, a 2004 ruling from a previous gerrymandering case could play a pivotal role in how the court stands in the future. 

“The ordered working of our Republic, and of the democratic process, depends on a sense of decorum and restraint in all branches of government, and in the citizenry itself,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in 2004. Kennedy’s statement is “the most important line” in the decision, Foley told The New York Times, adding,  “He’s going to look at what’s going on in North Carolina as the complete absence of that. I think that helps the plaintiffs in any of these cases.”


 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider a gerrymandering case involving Wisconsin state legislative districts. The court also granted a request by the state to temporarily block the lower court\'s decision until the appeal is resolved. The case is Gill v. Whitford.

more info & analysis...