Major Pending Cases
- See All Pending Cases
- See All Archived Cases
- AAPD v. Herrara
- ACORN v. Murphy
- ACORN v. Scott
- Coleman v. Franken
- Common Cause v. Coffman
- Daien v. Ysursa
- DiMaio v. Democratic National Committee
- Farrakhan v. Locke
- Florida State Conference of the NAACP v. Browning
- Gonzalez v. Arizona; Navajo Nation v. Brewer; Purcell v. Gonzalez
- Janis v. Nelson
- King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell
- League of Women Voters v. Rokita
- LULAC of Texas v. State of Texas
- McCain-Palin 2008 v. Cunningham
- Minnesota Majority v. Ritchie
- Morales v. Handel
- NAACP v. Billups
- NAACP-SCP v. Cortes
- Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Gonzales
- Ohio ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner
- Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections v. Browning
- Texas Democratic Party v. Bettencourt
- Texas Democratic Party v. Dallas County
- United States of America v. Brown
- United States v. New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense
- USSAF v. Land
- Valdez v. Herrera
- White v. Reed
- Young v. Hosemann
Election Law Litigation
ACORN v. Murphy
(page last updated November 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM)
Case Information
Current Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Case 1:09-cv-00849-WTL-DML)
All Courts: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Case 1:09-cv-00849-WTL-DML)
Topic(s): Voter Registration
State: Indiana
Date Filed: July 9, 2009
Issue:
Whether the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which requires public assistance agencies in Indiana to distribute voter application forms, has been violated.
Status:
Complaint filed 7/9.
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 7/9/09) - Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (filed 8/19/09)
- Motion for Pretrial Conference (filed 8/19/09)
- Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File (entered 8/20/09)
- Order Granting Motion for Pretrial Conference (entered 8/20/09)
- Amended Complaint - Class Action (filed 9/14/09)
- Motion to Certify Class (filed 9/14/09)
- Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (filed 9/14/09)
- Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion
- Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (filed 9/25/09)
- Motion to Dismiss (filed 9/28/09)
- Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time (filed 9/28/09)
- Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (filed 9/29/09)
- Corrected Amended Complaint - Class Action (filed 10/6/09)
- Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (filed 10/13/09)
- Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (filed 10/26/09)
- Response in Opposition to Motion to Certify Class (filed 10/30/09)
- Reply in Support of Motion to Certify Class (filed 11/13/09)
Related EL@M Stories
Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.
The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631
If you have trouble accessing this page or need to request an alternate format, please email the Moritz Law Webmaster
PDF files in this site may require Adobe Reader to view (link opens in new window)