OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Abramson v. Florida Elections Canvassing Commision

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: September 8, 2008 / January 6, 2009
State: Florida
Issues: Election Contest, Recount Resources
Courts that Heard this Case: Leon County Circuit Court (Case 2008 CA 002944 ); Florida 1st District Court of Appeals (Case 1D08-5638 )

Issue:

Whether the court has the authority to order a recount of election results after the statutorily prescribed recount procedures have been exhausted and the Elections Canvassing Commission has certified that it is unable to determine the true vote under Florida law.

Status:

Judgment entered by Circuit Court on 10/20/08.  Notice of appeal filed 11/17/08.  Initial brief on the merits filed in Court of Appeals on 11/21/08.  Response filed on 11/21/08.  Appellee answer briefs filed 12/05/08.  Appellant's reply brief filed 12/09/08.  Court denied motion to review denial of stay pending appeal on 12/19/08. Circuit Court mandate entered 1/6/09.

District Court of Appeals Documents

  • Notice of Appeal (filed 11/17/08)
  • Motion To Expedite (as amended) (filed 11/18/08)
  • Motion To Expedite (second amended) (filed 11/20/08)
  • Initial Brief on Merits PDF (filed 11/21/08)
  • RESPONSE (filed 11/21/08)
  • Grant Expediting (entered 11/24/08) Appellee's second amended motion to expedite filed November 20, 2008, is granted. This proceeding is hereby expedited. No request for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of emergency circumstances. The court notes that the initial brief has been filed. The answer brief shall be filed no later than December 5, 2008. The reply brief shall be filed no later than December 9, 2008. In lieu of a record on appeal, the case shall proceed on an appendix filed by appellant.
  • Answer Brief of State Appellees PDF (filed 12/5/08)
    • Appendix
  • Answer Brief of Appellee William "Bill" Abramson PDF (filed 12/5/08)
    • Appendix
  • Appellee's Answer Brief (att'y Ronald A. Labasky)(filed 12/5/08)
  • Appellant's Reply Brief PDF (filed 12/9/08)
  • Motion for review of denial of stay pending appeal (filed 12/17/08)
  • Denial of Motion (entered 12/19/08)
  • Court/Agency Mandate Cover Letter (filed 1/06/09)
  • Circuit Court Mandate (entered 1/06/09)
  • Case Permanent (entered 2/16/09)

Circuit Court Documents

Related EL@M Stories

Commentary

Daniel P. Tokaji

Is Ted Cruz Eligible to Be President? Letís Find Out

Daniel P. Tokaji

Donald Trump has revived the question whether Senator Ted Cruz is ineligible to serve as President due to his birth in Canada. The issue cries out for judicial resolution, but there are constitutional and prudential obstacles to a federal court deciding it.  This comment argues that the most promising avenue  is a state court lawsuit challenging Senator Cruz’s eligibility and seeking his removal from the primary ballot. There’s at least one state – Pennsylvania – where the deadline for filing hasn’t yet expired, but if skeptics of Cruz’s eligibility want to sue there they must act quickly, no later than Tuesday. Litigating the case through state court would tee up the issue for Supreme Court review, which would be helpful in resolving the recurrent question of what it means to be a “natural born Citizen."

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Rules for Plaintiffs in Ohio Early Voting Case

Today, U.S. District Judge Michael Watson issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in an Ohio early voting case, determining that Ohio\'s reduction of in-person early voting days violated Equal Protection and the Voting Rights Act. Judge Watson dismissed additional claims brought by the plaintiffs. A bench trial was held in late 2015. The case is Ohio Organizing Collaborative v. Husted.

more info & analysis...