OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Wilson v. Kasich

Case Information

Date Filed: January 4, 2012
State: Ohio
Issue: Redistricting
Courts that Heard this Case: Supreme Court of Ohio (Case 12-0019)

Issue:

Whether the Ohio Apportionment Board violated Article XI of the Ohio Constitution in its reapportionment of the Ohio General Assembly.

Status:

Complaint filed 1/04/12. Answers filed 1/17/12. Relators' merit brief filed 1/23/12. Secretary of State Husted's merit brief filed 1/30/12. Merit brief of Governor Kasich, Senate President Niehaus, and Auditor Yost filed 1/30/12. Oral argument held 4/24/12. Opinion issued 11/27/12.

Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Friday round-up

A blog post written by Professor Edward Foley for ElectionLaw@Moritz about the U.S. Supreme Court case Benisek v. Lamone was requoted in SCOTUSblog. 

 

“[There] are reasons to be skeptical, at least early in the stages of the intellectual inquiry, that there would be a single ‘grand unified theory of partisan gerrymandering’ under the U.S. Constitution,” Foley writes. 


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...