OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Van Hollen v. IRS

Case Information

Date Filed: August 21, 2013
State: Washington, D.C.
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:13-cv-01276)

Issue:

Issue 1:

Did the IRS unlawfully withhold or unreasonably delay in failing to initiate a rulemaking to amend TR 1.501(c)(4)?

Issue 2:

 Does the IRS's directive constitute an act that is arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion because it permits section 501(c)(4) organizations to engage in substantial election campagin interventions?

Status:

Complaint filed 8/21/13. Case consolidated with CREW v. IRS on 9/6/13. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Van Hollen, Democracy 21, Campaign Legal Center, and Public Citizen, Inc. filed 12/6/13.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Filibusters are not for shutdowns

Edward B. Foley

The minority party must win elections, not derail the government, to prevail on policy.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180207/inside-story-on-ohios-redistricting-deal

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in The Columbus Dispatch about partisan congressional redistricting in Ohio. 

 

 

"I can’t think of anywhere where we’ve had a situation like we’ve had here for the past couple of years,” Tokai said. “People in Ohio’s state legislature recognize there’s a serious problem.”



 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...