OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Davis v. Perry

Case Information

Date Filed: September 22, 2011
State: Texas
Issues: Redistricting, Vote Dillution
Courts that Heard this Case: United States Court for the Western District of Texas (Case 5:11-cv-00788); United States Supreme Court (Case No. 11A521 ); US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Case 14-50042)

Issue:

Whether Texas' State Senate Redistricting Plan violates the Voting Rights Act.

Status:

District Court adopted interim redistricting plan on 11/26/11. U.S. Supreme Court stayed District Court order pending oral argument scheduled 1/9/12. Supreme Court opinion filed 1/20/12. District Court Order Entering a Redistricting Plan 3/1/12. Court Order Adopting interim plan for 2012 election entered 9/7/12. Final Judgment filed 9/4/13. Circuit Court Order Dismissing Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction filed 1/16/14. Amended Notice of Appeal filed 1/31/14. Appellee's Brief filed 6/9/14. Appellant's Reply Brief filed 6/25/14. Oral Argument filed 10/27/14. Opinion and Judgment filed 3/17/14. Order denying petition for rehearing en banc filed 4/14/15. Mandate issued 4/22/15.

See also Davis v. Perry and Perez v. Texas

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

Supreme Court Documents

 

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Columbus City Council Will See Some Reforms, But Not For Another Six Years

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in WOSU about changes to Columbus City Council that will stem from the passage of Issue 3.

 

“In a city where one political party is dominant, it makes sense to think about the citizen's commission to take it out of the hands of the politicians,” Foley said. “Because if you leave it in the hands of the politicians, it’s hard to get balance between the two parties.”


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Decides Wisconsin and Maryland Gerrymandering Cases on Procedural Grounds

In opinions issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two gerrymandering cases on procedural grounds. In an opinion in the Wisconsin case of Gill v. Whitford, the Court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the legislature\'s redistricting plan. In an opinion in the Maryland case of Benisek v. Lamone, the Court determined that the District Court was within its discretion in denying preliminary relief to the plaintiffs challenging the legislature\'s redistricting plan.

more info & analysis...