OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Davis v. Perry

Case Information

Date Filed: September 22, 2011
State: Texas
Issues: Redistricting, Vote Dillution
Courts that Heard this Case: United States Court for the Western District of Texas (Case 5:11-cv-00788); United States Supreme Court (Case No. 11A521 ); US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Case 14-50042)

Issue:

Whether Texas' State Senate Redistricting Plan violates the Voting Rights Act.

Status:

District Court adopted interim redistricting plan on 11/26/11. U.S. Supreme Court stayed District Court order pending oral argument scheduled 1/9/12. Supreme Court opinion filed 1/20/12. District Court Order Entering a Redistricting Plan 3/1/12. Court Order Adopting interim plan for 2012 election entered 9/7/12. Final Judgment filed 9/4/13. Circuit Court Order Dismissing Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction filed 1/16/14. Amended Notice of Appeal filed 1/31/14. Appellee's Brief filed 6/9/14. Appellant's Reply Brief filed 6/25/14. Oral Argument filed 10/27/14. Opinion and Judgment filed 3/17/14. Order denying petition for rehearing en banc filed 4/14/15. Mandate issued 4/22/15.

See also Davis v. Perry and Perez v. Texas

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

Supreme Court Documents

 

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Rules for State in Ohio NVRA Case

In an order issued late yesterday, U.S. District Judge George Smith denied plaintiffs\' motion for summary judgment in a case challenging the removal of voters from the rolls for non-participation in recent elections. Judge Smith ruled that this practice does not violate the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). He entered final judgment in favor of the defendant, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, clearing the path for a possible appeal to the Sixth Circuit. The case is Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Husted.

more info & analysis...