OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Texas v. Holder

Case Information

Date Filed: January 24, 2012
State: Texas
Issues: Voting Rights Act, Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:12-cv-00128); United States Supreme Court (Case 12-1028)

Issue:

Whether Texas' voter ID law should be granted preclearance under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

Status:

Complaint Filed 1/24/12. Answer filed 4/9/12. Trial commenced 7/10/12. Opinion Denying Texas' Request for a Declaratory Judgment on Count One issued 8/30/12. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 10/1/12. Order entering final judgment on claim one filed 12/17/12. Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court filed 12/19/12. Lawyer's Committee Motion to Affirm filed 5/9/13. DOJ's Motion to Affirm filed 5/9/13. Rodriguez Intervenor's Motion to Affirm filed 5/9/13. Judgment Vacated and Remanded in light of Shelby County v. Holder filed 6/27/13. Case dismissed on 8/27/13. Order denying Kennie-Intervenros' Motion for Attorney's Fees filed 8/11/14.

Supreme Court Documents

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Rules for State in Ohio NVRA Case

In an order issued late yesterday, U.S. District Judge George Smith denied plaintiffs\' motion for summary judgment in a case challenging the removal of voters from the rolls for non-participation in recent elections. Judge Smith ruled that this practice does not violate the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). He entered final judgment in favor of the defendant, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, clearing the path for a possible appeal to the Sixth Circuit. The case is Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Husted.

more info & analysis...