OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, et al.

Case Information

Date Filed: October 18, 2010
State: Ohio
Issue: Freedom of Information
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 1:10-cv-720); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (Case 10-4320)

Issue:

Whether Ohio Revised Code Sections 3517.21(B)(9) and (10) are facially unconstitutional due to vagueness and lacking an actual malice requirement, and unconstitutional as applied to lobbyists taking positions on political issues. 

Status:

Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Case entered 12/20/10.

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Ohio voters may change way Congress lines are drawn

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in the Dayton Daily News about the potential outcomes of several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that will address partisan gerrymandering.

“One direction is the court basically abandoning any role to try to police excessive partisanship in these maps,” Foley said. “The other fork in the road would take the federal judiciary down the path of being something of a police officer on this issue.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...