Last Updated: September 14, 2012 at 1:50 PM
State ex rel Voters First v. The Ohio Ballot Board
Case Information
Date Filed: August 23, 2012
State: Ohio
Issue: Redistricting
Courts that Heard this Case: Supreme Court of Ohio (Case 12-1443)
Issue:
Whether the language adopted by the Ohio Ballot Board for a proposed amendment to the Ohio Consitution on legislative redistricting should be declared invalid.
Status:
Complaint filed 8/23/12. Answer filed 8/24/12. Slip opinion issued 9/12/12.
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 8/23/12) - Answer
(filed 8/24/12) - Relators' Merit Brief
(filed 8/27/12) - Evidence of Relators
(filed 8/27/12) - Evidence of Respondents
(filed 8/30/12) - Respondents' Merit Brief
(filed 8/30/12) - Relators' Reply Brief
(filed 8/31/12) - Slip Opinion
(filed 9/12/12) - Entry Granting Writ of Mandamus
(filed 9/12/12)
DISCLOSURE: Election Law @ Moritz Senior Fellow Daniel Tokaji is one of the parties in this case. No EL@M member who participates in any lawsuit covered on the EL@M website is involved in generating the website's information or analysis on that lawsuit.


Commentary
Silence of the Lambs
Dale A. Oesterle
With the election of 2012 now well over and past the second inauguration of the incumbent President, the historical analysis of the events has begun and will last as long as written human history lasts. An interesting tidbit may already be lost to the majesty of the moment.
The voters of three very different states, Alaska, New Hampshire, and Ohio, all had an opportunity to call state constitutional conventions. In each state the voters turned the opportunity down by very similar votes, 68%, 64% and 68% respectively against.
more commentary...