OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Shelby County, Alabama v. Lynch

Case Information

Date Filed: April 27, 2010
State: Alabama
Issue: Voting Rights Act
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:10-cv-00651); U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Case 14-5138); U.S. Supreme Court (Case 12-96)

Issue:

Whether Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Voting Rights Act are unconstitutional.

Status:

Appellee Attorney General Holder brief filed 12/1/11.  Amicus Brief of New York Law School Racial Justice Project filed 12/7/11. Appellant Shelby County, Alabama filed 12/15/11. Court of Appeals Opinion and Order filed 5/18/12. Petition for certiorari filed 7/20/12. Brief for Respondents in Opposition to certiorari filed 9/24/12. Petition for Certiorari granted 11/9/12. Set for argument 2/27/13. Petitioner's Brief filed 12/26/12. Reply Brief for Petitioner filed 2/19/13. Supreme Court oral argument held 2/27/13. Opinion finding section 4 unconstitutional filed 6/25/13. Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees filed 5/28/14. Notice of Appeal filed 6/3/14. Appellant's Brief filed 10/28/14. Appellee's Brief filed 12/12/14. Joint Appellee's Brief filed 12/22/14. Appellant Reply Brief filed 1/16/15. Oral argument heard on 4/10/15. Per Curiam Judgment 9/01/15. Opinion filed 9/01/15.  MANDATE of USCA ORDERED10/27/15.

Disclosure: EL@M Senior Fellow Daniel Tokaji is an amicus curiae supporting Respondents in this case. No EL@M member who participates in any lawsuit covered on the EL@M website is involved in generating the website's information or analysis on that lawsuit.

District Court Documents

 

Court of Appeals Documents

 

Supreme Court Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

U.S. Supreme Court upholds Ohio voter purging process

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in The Blade about Ohio’s voter purge law, which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. 

 

“I don’t think there’s any real reason to believe that the drop-off is going to be significant,” Mr. Foley said. “The Ohio law that was upheld in this case never disenfranchised anybody.”

 

 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Upholds Most Texas Districts in Racial Gerrymandering Case

In a 5-4 decision that reversed the ruling of the District Court, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the drawing of most of the disputed Texas districts did not violate the Constitution or the Voting Rights Act. The case is Abbott v. Perez.

more info & analysis...