OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Benisek v. Lamone

Case Information

Date Filed: November 11, 2013
State: Maryland
Issue: Redistricting
Current Court: US Supreme Court (Case 17-333)

Issue:

Original Issue before U.S. Supreme Court: Whether a single-judge district court can conclude that a three-judge panel is not required to hear a 28 U.S.C. § 2284 complaint, not because it is insubstantial, but because the complaint fails to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as determined by the court.

Current Issue: Whether the Maryland legislature's redrawing of Congressional district lines violates the U.S. Constitution.

Status:

US District Court for the District of Maryland Opinion filed on 04/08/2014. US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit Opinion filed on 10/07/2014. US Supreme Court Granted Petition for Writ of Cert on 06/08/2015. Oral Argument held on 11/04/15. U.S. Supreme Court Opinion filed 12/8/15. Second Amended Complaint on remand filed 3/3/16. Motion to Dismiss filed 4/20/16. Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss filed 8/24/16. Answer to Amended Complaint filed 9/7/16. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 5/31/17. Joint Status Report filed 6/2/17 and 6/30/17. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed 6/30/17. Memorandum Opinion Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 8/24/17. Order Entering Stay filed 8/24/17. Notice of Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court filed 8/25/17. Jurisdictional Statement filed 9/1/17. Motion to Expedite filed 9/1/17. Order Denying Motion to Expedite filed 9/13/17. Motion to Affirm filed 10/31/17. Brief in Opposition to Motion to Affirm filed 11/13/17. Order postponing further consideration of jurisdiction question until hearing of case on merits filed 12/8/17.

 

District Court Documents


Circuit Court of Appeals Documents

U.S. Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Ohio voters may change way Congress lines are drawn

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in the Dayton Daily News about the potential outcomes of several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that will address partisan gerrymandering.

“One direction is the court basically abandoning any role to try to police excessive partisanship in these maps,” Foley said. “The other fork in the road would take the federal judiciary down the path of being something of a police officer on this issue.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...