OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

SEIU v. Husted

Case Information

Date Filed: June 22, 2012
State: Ohio
Issue: Provisional Ballots
Current Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:12-cv-562)

Issue:

Whether the failure to ensure that all provisional ballots are properly counted violates the 14th Amendment, the right to vote, the 17th amendment and/or federal voting statutes.

Status:

Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 6/22/12. Answer to Second Amended Complaint filed 8/7/12. Plenary Opinion and Order issued 8/27/12. State of Ohio's Motion to Intervene filed 9/4/12. State of Ohio's and Secretary of State's Notices of Appeal filed 9/6/12. Motion to dismiss state's appeal filed 9/7/12. State's response to motion to dismiss filed 9/7/12. State's brief and Secretary Husted's brief filed 9/14/12. SEIU's brief filed 9/21/12. State of Ohio's appeal dismissed for lack of standing 9/28/12. Oral argument held 10/1/12. Sixth Circuit Opinion issued 10/11/12. District Court Opinion and Order granting motion for preliminary injunction filed 10/26/12. Appellants Emergency Motion to Stay Injunction pending appeal filed 10/26/12. Stay issued by 6th Circuit 10/31/12. Plaintiffs' Joint Notice of Husted's Directive filed 11/2/12. State's memorandum in opposition filed 11/6/12. Petition for en banc rehearing filed 11/15/12. Order denying petition for en banc rehearing filed 12/5/12. Letter Revising Briefing Schedule filed 1/7/13. Briefing Schedule Extended 5/15/13. Order Dismissing Appeal and Denying Vacatur filed 9/27/13. Joint Motion for  Indicative Ruling to Effect Terms of Settlement on Appeal filed 1/14/14. Order granting Motion to vacate filed 1/31/14. Order vacating Nov. 13, 2012 Order filed 2/7/14. Notice of Appeal filed 10/28/14. Notice of Cross-Appeal filed 11/7/14. Order regarding Plaintiff's Bill of Costs filed 2/17/15. Notice of Appeal filed 3/19/15. For further appellate status, see NEOCH v. Husted.

Related Cases: NEOCH v. Husted

Disclosure: EL@M Senior Fellow Daniel Tokaji is one of the attorneys representing amici League of Women Voters of Ohio and Common Cause of Ohio in this case. No EL@M member who participates in any lawsuit covered on the EL@M website is involved in generating the website's information or analysis on that lawsuit.

 

 

Court of Appeals Documents

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

Commentary

Daniel P. Tokaji

Is Ted Cruz Eligible to Be President? Letís Find Out

Daniel P. Tokaji

Donald Trump has revived the question whether Senator Ted Cruz is ineligible to serve as President due to his birth in Canada. The issue cries out for judicial resolution, but there are constitutional and prudential obstacles to a federal court deciding it.  This comment argues that the most promising avenue  is a state court lawsuit challenging Senator Cruz’s eligibility and seeking his removal from the primary ballot. There’s at least one state – Pennsylvania – where the deadline for filing hasn’t yet expired, but if skeptics of Cruz’s eligibility want to sue there they must act quickly, no later than Tuesday. Litigating the case through state court would tee up the issue for Supreme Court review, which would be helpful in resolving the recurrent question of what it means to be a “natural born Citizen."

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

District Court Upholds NC Voter ID Law

In a 485-page opinion released yesterday, U.S. District Judge Thomas Schroeder upheld North Carolina\'s voter ID law. A trial on the photo ID issue was held in January and February. The case is League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Howard.

more info & analysis...