OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Rudolph, et al., v. Fenumiai

Case Information

Date Filed: November 1, 2010
State: Alaska
Issues: Election 2010, Polling Place Challenges
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska (Case 3:10-cv-00243)

Issue:

Whether the Alaska Division of Elections is in violation of the Voting Rights Act by providing write in candidate votings lists at polling places without proper clearance from the US Department of Justice.

Status:

Reply to Response to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed 11/1/10.  Three-Judge Panel request filed 11/5/10.  Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants filed 11/22/10.  Order Dismissing Case entered 11/23/10.  Amicus Brief Submitted by American Unity Legal Defense Fund filed 11/23/10.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Anti-Trumpersí Most Futile Effort Yet to Stop Trump from Being Sworn In

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in Law Newz about efforts to persuade Chief Justice John Roberts to decline conducting Donald Trump’s Oath of Office on Inauguration Day. Even though the U.S. Constitution requires the President to take an oath of office, the the Chief Justice is not required to administer it. It is unlikely that such attempts will prevent Trump from being sworn in, Foley said.

“I think the main point is that the oath doesn’t need to be administered by the Chief Justice,” he said. “After Kennedy’s assassination, a federal district judge in Texas administered the oath to Johnson.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal District Court Panel Finds Unconstitutional Gerrymandering in Alabama

In an opinion released today, a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama found unconstitutional gerrymandering in 12 Alabama districts. In a separate concurring and dissenting opinion, one judge on the panel would have found more districts unconstitutionally drawn. The case is Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama.

more info & analysis...