OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Rudolph, et al., v. Fenumiai

Case Information

Date Filed: November 1, 2010
State: Alaska
Issues: Election 2010, Polling Place Challenges
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska (Case 3:10-cv-00243)

Issue:

Whether the Alaska Division of Elections is in violation of the Voting Rights Act by providing write in candidate votings lists at polling places without proper clearance from the US Department of Justice.

Status:

Reply to Response to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed 11/1/10.  Three-Judge Panel request filed 11/5/10.  Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants filed 11/22/10.  Order Dismissing Case entered 11/23/10.  Amicus Brief Submitted by American Unity Legal Defense Fund filed 11/23/10.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Michigan Federal Judge Blocks Law Prohibiting Straight Ticket Voting

U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain issued an opinion blocking enforcement of a Michigan law prohibiting straight-ticket voting. This voting method allows voters to easily select the entire slate of candidates on the ballot from a particular party. Michigan abolished straight-ticket voting by enacting a law effective in January. In granting the plaintffs\' motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge Drain determined that the law \"presents a disproportionate burden on African-Americans\' right to vote.\" The case is Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Johnson.

more info & analysis...