OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

The Real Truth About Abortion, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission, et al.

Case Information

Date Filed: July 30, 2008
State: National
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Case 3:08-cv-00483); U.S. Circuit Court for the 4th Circuit (Case 11-1760 ); U.S. Supreme Court (Case 12-311)

Issue:

Whether an injunction should be issued regarding the FEC’s policy for implementing the “major purpose” test in federal political committee determinations.

Status:

Notice of appeal filed 7/16/11. Opinion Granting DOJ's Motion for Summary Judgment entered 6/16/11. Notice of Supplemental Authority to Motion for Summary Judgment filed 2/9/11.  Response to Notice filed by Federal Election Commission on 2/14/11. Final Order Granting the Department of Justice's FEC's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 6/16/11. Notice of appeal filed 7/16/11. Appellant files Circuit Court brief 9/19/11. Circuit Court oral arguments held 3/21/12. Opinion issued 6/12/12. Formal Mandate issued 8/6/12. Petition for cert filed 9/13/12. Brief in Opposition filed 11/13/12. Reply Brief filed 11/26/12. Order Denying Cert. Petition filed 1/7/13.

District Court Documents

Circuit Court Documents

Supreme Court Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Daniel P. Tokaji

Tokaji Testimony for Senate DISCLOSE Hearing

Professor Tokaji has submitted the following writing testimony for today's hearing before the U.S. Senate Rules and Administration Committee on the proposed DISCLOSE Act.

 

more info & analysis...