OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

The Real Truth About Abortion, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission, et al.

Case Information

Date Filed: July 30, 2008
State: National
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Case 3:08-cv-00483); U.S. Circuit Court for the 4th Circuit (Case 11-1760 ); U.S. Supreme Court (Case 12-311)

Issue:

Whether an injunction should be issued regarding the FEC’s policy for implementing the “major purpose” test in federal political committee determinations.

Status:

Notice of appeal filed 7/16/11. Opinion Granting DOJ's Motion for Summary Judgment entered 6/16/11. Notice of Supplemental Authority to Motion for Summary Judgment filed 2/9/11.  Response to Notice filed by Federal Election Commission on 2/14/11. Final Order Granting the Department of Justice's FEC's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 6/16/11. Notice of appeal filed 7/16/11. Appellant files Circuit Court brief 9/19/11. Circuit Court oral arguments held 3/21/12. Opinion issued 6/12/12. Formal Mandate issued 8/6/12. Petition for cert filed 9/13/12. Brief in Opposition filed 11/13/12. Reply Brief filed 11/26/12. Order Denying Cert. Petition filed 1/7/13.

District Court Documents

Circuit Court Documents

Supreme Court Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Trump: Mike Pence to lead voter fraud probe

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in The Christian Science Monitor in an article about the investigation into voter fraud that will be led by Vice President Mike Pence. More than a dozen lawsuits nationwide regarding voting rights and access await federal court.

“Voting litigation is increasing, not decreasing,” Foley said. “The main impression … is that when a law looks like it’s engaging in outright disenfranchisement of a valid voter, even conservative judges have been stopping that. [But] the judiciary is more tolerant with state legislatures adjusting issues of convenience and accessibility, if the adjustment is not outright disenfranchisement.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Rules that Ohio Voter Services Website Violates ADA

A U.S. District Judge issued an opinion finding that the Ohio Secretary of State\'s voter services website violates Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act because it is not accessible to visually impaired Ohio voters. Judge George C. Smith ordered Secretary of State John Husted to make the site more accessible by September 29, 2017. As discussed in the opinion, the information on the voter services site does not meet established standards of accessibility for visually impaired voters who use screen reading software. The case is Hindel v. Husted.

more info & analysis...