OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Project Vote v. Kelly

Case Information

Date Filed: July 22, 2009
State: Pennsylvania
Issues: Ballot Access, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Case 2:09-cv-00951)

Issue:

Whether a Pennslyvania statute forbiding the payment of persons to solicit voter registration violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

Status:

 Judgment Entered 7/27/11. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed 7/16/10. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Denied file 9/28/10. ACORN Dismissed as Plaintiff filed 11/04/10. Defendant's and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 4/11/11. Briefs in Opposition filed 5/13/11.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Friday round-up

A blog post written by Professor Edward Foley for ElectionLaw@Moritz about the U.S. Supreme Court case Benisek v. Lamone was requoted in SCOTUSblog. 

 

“[There] are reasons to be skeptical, at least early in the stages of the intellectual inquiry, that there would be a single ‘grand unified theory of partisan gerrymandering’ under the U.S. Constitution,” Foley writes. 


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...