OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Project Vote v. Kelly

Case Information

Date Filed: July 22, 2009
State: Pennsylvania
Issues: Ballot Access, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Case 2:09-cv-00951)

Issue:

Whether a Pennslyvania statute forbiding the payment of persons to solicit voter registration violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

Status:

 Judgment Entered 7/27/11. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed 7/16/10. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Denied file 9/28/10. ACORN Dismissed as Plaintiff filed 11/04/10. Defendant's and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 4/11/11. Briefs in Opposition filed 5/13/11.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Ohio voters may change way Congress lines are drawn

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in the Dayton Daily News about the potential outcomes of several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that will address partisan gerrymandering.

“One direction is the court basically abandoning any role to try to police excessive partisanship in these maps,” Foley said. “The other fork in the road would take the federal judiciary down the path of being something of a police officer on this issue.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...