OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

 

Abbott v. Perez

Case Information

Date Filed: May 9, 2011
State: Texas
Issues: Redistricting, Vote Dillution
Current Court: United States Supreme Court (Case 17-586)

Issue:

Whether Texas' redistricting plan violates the Constitution because it does not make a good faith effort to maintain population equality and treats inmates as residents of the counties in which they are incarcerated.

Status:

Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Debbie Allen et al filed 10/14/15. Order denying preliminary injunction filed 11/16/15. Order for supplemental briefing in light of Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission filed 4/20/16. Non-U.S. Plaintiffs' Joint Motion for Entry of Judgment filed 12/30/16. Order denying motion for entry of judgment filed 1/5/17. Opinion finding some Congressional districts unlawfully drawn filed 3/10/17. Findings of Fact filed 3/10/17. Order finding intentional discrimination in drawing of Texas state House of Representatives districts, but ruling for state on other claims, filed 4/20/17. Findings of Fact in support of order filed 4/20/17. Order Denying Motion to Certify Record for Interlocutory Appeal filed 5/1/17. Post-trial briefs filed 7/31/17. Order on Plan C235 filed 8/15/17. Notice of Appeal filed 8/18/17. Motion for Stay Denied 8/18/17. Order on Plan H358 filed 8/24/17. Application for Stay filed in U.S. Supreme Court 8/25/17. Order Granting Temporary Stay for Texas Congressional redistricting case filed 8/28/17. Order Granting Temporary Stay for Texas House redistricting case filed 8/31/17. Response in Opposition to Stay Application filed 9/5/17. U.S. Supreme Court orders granting stays of Congressional and Texas House redistricting cases filed 9/12/17. Jurisdictional Statement on Congressional and Texas House Plans filed 10/17/17 and 10/27/17. Motion to Dismiss or Affirm filed 11/20/17. Gov. Abbott's reply in support of Jurisdictional Statement filed 12/4/17. Order agreeing to hear case, postponing jurisdiction question filed 1/12/18.

See also Davis v. Perry and Texas v. United States

 

District Court Documents

Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Filibusters are not for shutdowns

Edward B. Foley

The minority party must win elections, not derail the government, to prevail on policy.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180207/inside-story-on-ohios-redistricting-deal

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in The Columbus Dispatch about partisan congressional redistricting in Ohio. 

 

 

"I can’t think of anywhere where we’ve had a situation like we’ve had here for the past couple of years,” Tokai said. “People in Ohio’s state legislature recognize there’s a serious problem.”



 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...