OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

 

Abbott v. Perez

Case Information

Date Filed: May 9, 2011
State: Texas
Issues: Redistricting, Vote Dillution
Current Court: United States Supreme Court (Case 17-586)

Issue:

Whether Texas' redistricting plan violates the Constitution because it does not make a good faith effort to maintain population equality and treats inmates as residents of the counties in which they are incarcerated.

Status:

Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Debbie Allen et al filed 10/14/15. Order denying preliminary injunction filed 11/16/15. Order for supplemental briefing in light of Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission filed 4/20/16. Non-U.S. Plaintiffs' Joint Motion for Entry of Judgment filed 12/30/16. Order denying motion for entry of judgment filed 1/5/17. Opinion finding some Congressional districts unlawfully drawn filed 3/10/17. Findings of Fact filed 3/10/17. Order finding intentional discrimination in drawing of Texas state House of Representatives districts, but ruling for state on other claims, filed 4/20/17. Findings of Fact in support of order filed 4/20/17. Order Denying Motion to Certify Record for Interlocutory Appeal filed 5/1/17. Post-trial briefs filed 7/31/17. Order on Plan C235 filed 8/15/17. Notice of Appeal filed 8/18/17. Motion for Stay Denied 8/18/17. Order on Plan H358 filed 8/24/17. Application for Stay filed in U.S. Supreme Court 8/25/17. Order Granting Temporary Stay for Texas Congressional redistricting case filed 8/28/17. Order Granting Temporary Stay for Texas House redistricting case filed 8/31/17. Response in Opposition to Stay Application filed 9/5/17. U.S. Supreme Court orders granting stays of Congressional and Texas House redistricting cases filed 9/12/17. Jurisdictional Statement on Congressional and Texas House Plans filed 10/17/17 and 10/27/17. Motion to Dismiss or Affirm filed 11/20/17. Gov. Abbott's reply in support of Jurisdictional Statement filed 12/4/17. Order agreeing to hear case, postponing jurisdiction question filed 1/12/18.

See also Davis v. Perry and Texas v. United States

 

District Court Documents

Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Friday round-up

A blog post written by Professor Edward Foley for ElectionLaw@Moritz about the U.S. Supreme Court case Benisek v. Lamone was requoted in SCOTUSblog. 

 

“[There] are reasons to be skeptical, at least early in the stages of the intellectual inquiry, that there would be a single ‘grand unified theory of partisan gerrymandering’ under the U.S. Constitution,” Foley writes. 


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...