OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz



Ohio Democratic Party v. Ohio Republican Party

Case Information

Date Filed: October 30, 2016
State: Ohio
Issue: Voter Intimidation
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Case 1:16-cv-02645-JG); Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Case 16-4268); U.S. Supreme Court (Case )


Whether the actions of the Ohio Republican Party, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Roger J. Stone, Jr., and Stop the Steal Inc., are violating the Voting Rights Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act by intimidating minority voters. The plaintiffs request that the courts issue an order to stop "voter intimidation" and for Stone and Stop the Steal Inc. to stop certain activities such as exit polling.


Complaint filed 10/30/16. Opinion and Order granting TRO filed 11/4/16. Emergency Request to Stay District Court decision and request for initial en banc hearing filed 11/5/16. Sixth Circuit Order granting stay of District Court decision and denying request for initial en banc hearing filed 11/6/16. Emergency Application to Vacate Sixth Circuit Stay filed in U.S. Supreme Court 11/6/16. U.S. Supreme Court order denying emergency application filed 11/7/16. Case Dismissed 11/10/16.


District Court Documents

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Documents

U.S. Supreme Court Documents




Edward B. Foley

Filibusters are not for shutdowns

Edward B. Foley

The minority party must win elections, not derail the government, to prevail on policy.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

New Districts In 2018 Unlikely As SCOTUS Continues To Weigh Wisconsin Gerrymandering Lawsuit

Professor Edward Foley appeared on Wisconsin Public Radio to discuss Gill v. Whitford, a landmark redistricting lawsuit before the U.S. Supreme Court. 


“Even if they're victorious … I think the 2018 elections will be on the old maps," Foley said. 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...