OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Gonzales

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: August 4, 2006 / November 3, 2009
State: Texas
Issue: Voting Rights Act
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court, District of Columbia (Case 1:06-cv-01384-PLF-EGS); United States Supreme Court (Case 08-322)

Issue:

Whether the imposition of §5 of the Voting Rights Act requirements, 42 U.S.C. §1973c, upon Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One is improper and/or unconstitutional as the district has allegedly remedied the problems giving rise to the initial imposition of these requirements.

Status:

A juridictional statement was filed on 9/4/08.  An amicus brief was filed by the Mountain States Legal Foundation on 10/10/08.  Motion to affirm filed by Appellee 11/26/08. Oral Arguments set for 4/29/09. Appellant's Reply filed 4/15. Judgement Reversed and Case Remanded on 6/22/09.  Consent Judgment and Decree 11/3/09.

U.S. Supreme Court Documents

District Court Documents

Related Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court strikes down aggregate campaign contribution cap

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion today in McCutcheon v. FEC, striking down aggregate limits on political campaign contributions but leaving in place limits on contributions to individual candidates.

more info & analysis...