1. Help
2. Campus map
3. Find people
4. Webmail
5. Search Ohio State

• About
  EL@M
  • About Us
  • Experts by Topic
• Faculty
  • Edward B. "Ned" Foley
  • Daniel P. Tokaji
  • Terri L. Enns
  • Steven F. Huefner
  • Donald B. Tobin
  • EL@M Fellows
  • EL@M Staff
  • Experts by Topic
• Election Law
  Litigation
  • Major Pending Cases
  • Archived Cases
• Current
  Features
  • News Wire
  • Key Questions for Key States
  • Compare State Election Laws
  • State-Specific Election Laws
  • State-by-State Coverage
  • Topic-by-Topic Coverage
  • Voting Machine Issues Nationwide (2008)
  • From Registration to Recounts (Book)
  • Major Election Law Reports
  • Equal Vote
  • Free & Fair
  • Featured Comments
• Archived
  Features
  • 50 Questions for 5 Key States
  • 2008 Pre-Election Litigation Risk Assessment
  • 2008 Primary Post-Election Timeline
  • Voter ID Litigation Nationwide
  • 2006 Election Overview
  • 2006 Recount Roundup
  • 2006 Ohio Primary Problems
  • 2006 Voting Technology Nationwide
  • 2006 Election Podcasts
  • Electronic Roundtable '06
  • Ohio Voter Registration Regulations
  • e-Book
  • Past Case Decisions
  • 2005 Redistricting Developments
• Biweekly
  Update
  • Subscribe
• Related
  Links
• McCain v.
  Obama
• Free & Fair
  (Foley)
• A Joint Project with
  the Moritz Law Library
• Media

NEOCH v. Blackwell

(page last updated March 24, 2009 at 2:00 PM)

Case Information

All Courts: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:06-cv-00896-ALM-TPK); U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit (Case 06-4412)
Topic(s): Voter ID
State: Ohio
Date Filed: October 24, 2006

Issue:

(1) Whether Ohio's voter ID laws are unconstitutional as "confusing, vague, and impossible to apply" in violation of the right to vote; whether the laws are unconstitutional because they apply only to in-person voters and not to absentee voters; whether they are unconstitutional because they may bar voters who do not have required identification from voting on Election Day; whether they are unconstitutional because only some forms of ID must have current address; whether they are unconstitutional as a poll tax. (2) Whether Ohio's provisional-ballot laws are unconstitutionally vague and therefore violate Equal Protection and Due Process.

Status:

Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injuction on 10/14/08.  A hearing on the motion is set for Wednesday, 10/23/08.  Motion for Preliminary Injunction granted on 10/27/08. Amended complaint filed 11/21/08.  Answers filed 11/24/08. Brief filed by Plaintiffs NEOCH 1/20/09. Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Resopnse entered 2/17.  Responses due 2/27.

Related Cases: State ex rel. Skaggs v. Brunner

Consolidated Case: Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner

District Court Documents

• Complaint (filed 10/24/06)
• Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (filed 10/24/06)
• Motion to Expedite Discovery (filed 10/24/06)
  • Proposed Order
• Notice of TRO Hearing (filed 10/24/06)
  • Hearing set for 10/25/2006
• Notice of Preliminary Injunction Hearing (filed 10/24/06)
  • Hearing set for 10/31/06
• Response in Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (filed 10/25/06)
  • Exhibit - Purcell v. Gonzalez
  • Exhibit - Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita
• Declaration of Sara Feldenkris (filed 10/25/06)
• Declaration of J. Christopher Nielson (filed 10/25/06)
• Declaration of Kevin Fisher (filed 10/25/06)
• Answer (filed 10/25/06)
• NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 12/13/2006 @ 02:30 PM in chambers before Norah McCann King (entered 10/26/06)
• Defendant Blackwell's Notice of Filing (filed 10/26/06)
  • Exhibit A - Directive 2006-78
  • Exhibit B - Summary of Election Laws by State
• Order transferring action from Judge Gregory L. Frost to Judge Algenon L. Marbley (entered 10/26/06)
• Order granting TRO and setting a Preliminary Injunction Hearing for 11/1/2006 (entered 10/26/06)
• Order requiring Defendant Blackwell to issue Directive (entered 10/26/06)
  • Order to County Boards of Elections
• Order to all County Board of Elections (entered 10/26/06)
• Notice of Appeal by Defendant Blackwell (filed 10/26/06)
  • Exhibit - Document 17
  • Exhibit - Document 18-1
  • Exhibit - Document 18-2
  • Exhibit - Document 19
• Motion to Expedite Discovery by Defendant Blackwell (filed 10/27/06)
• MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, by Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (filed 10/27/06)
  • Exhibit A
  • Exhibit B
  • Exhibit C
  • Exhibit D
• TRANSCRIPT REQUEST for Motion to Intervene Hearing by Intervenor State Of Ohio for proceedings held on 10/27/06 before Judge Marbley (filed 10/30/06)
• Defendant J. Kenneth Blackwell's Memorandum in Opposition to Preliminary Injunction (filed 10/31/06)
  • Exhibit 1
  • Exhibit 2
  • Exhibit 3
  • Exhibit 4
• Intervenor State of Ohio's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (filed 10/31/06)
  • Exhibit Testimony
  • Caselaw
  • HB 3
• Deposition of Susan R. Johnson taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 10/31/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
• Deposition of Kelly S. Pallante taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 10/31/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
• Deposition of Betty L. McGary taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 10/31/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
  • Part 4
  • Part 5
  • Part 6
• Deposition of Matthew M. Damschroder taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 10/31/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
  • Part 4
  • Part 5
  • Part 6
  • Part 7
  • Part 8
  • Part 9
  • Part 10
  • Part 11
  • Part 12
  • Part 13
  • Part 14
  • Part 15
  • Part 16
  • Part 17
  • Part 18
  • Part 19
  • Part 20
  • Part 21
  • Part 22
  • Part 23
  • Part 24
  • Part 25
  • Part 26
• Deposition of Michael Vu taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 10/31/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
  • Part 4
• Notice of Filing (filed 11/1/06)
  • Affidavit of Mark Landes
  • State v. Hubbard
• Notice by Defendant J Kenneth Blackwell of Filing Discovery Responses (filed 11/1/06)
  • Exhibit - Plaintiffs' discovery responses #1
  • Exhibit - Plaintiffs' discovery responses #2
  • Exhibit - Plaintiffs' discovery responses #3
• Notice by Defendant J Kenneth Blackwell of Filing Voter Fraud Studies (filed 11/1/06)
  • Exhibit - Voter Fraud Studies #1
  • Exhibit - Voter Fraud Studies #2
  • Exhibit - Voter Fraud Studies #3
  • Exhibit - Voter Fraud Studies #4
• Notice by Defendant J Kenneth Blackwell of Filing Deposition Transcripts (filed 11/1/06)
  • Exhibit - John Williams deposition transcript #1
  • Exhibit - John Williams deposition transcript #2
  • Exhibit - Jill Kelly deposition transcript
• Deposition of John Williams taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 11/1/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
  • Part 4
  • Part 5
  • Part 6
  • Part 7
  • Part 8
  • Part 9
• Deposition of Jill B. Kelly taken on 10/30/06 by Plaintiffs (filed 11/1/06)
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
  • Part 4
• Consent Order (entered 11/1/06)
• Letter from USCA enclosing a corrected page of the Sixth Circuit's opinion (entered 11/3/06)
• Motion to Enforce Consent Order (entered 11/14/06)
  • Exhibit A
  • Exhibit B
  • Exhibit C
  • Exhibit D
• Agreed Enforcement Order (entered 11/15/06)
• Order to Show Cause (entered 11/17/06)
• Motion to Show Cause (filed 11/20/06)
  • Exhibit A
  • Exhibit B
  • Exhibit C
• AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re MOTION for Order to Show Cause Declaration of Alvin E Mathews, Jr. (filed 11/21/06)
• AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re MOTION for Order to Show Cause Declaration of Subodh Chandra (filed 11/21/06)
• ORDER re the 11/21/06 Show Cause Hearing: The Court vacates the Order to Show Cause and Overrules Defendant's Motion for Order to Show Cause (filed 11/22/06)
• MANDATE of USCA as to Notice of Appeal (entered 12/7/06)
• REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (filed 12/11/06)
• PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER (entered 12/14/06)
  • The State of Ohio's Motion to Intervene is granted - answer due 1/22/2007.
  • Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 6/15/2007.
  • Primary Expert due by 9/30/2007. Rebuttal Expert due by 11/30/2007.
  • Discovery due by 1/31/2008.
  • Dispositive motions due by 2/28/2008.
• Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings until July 9, 2007 (filed 4/20/07)
• Joint MOTION to Stay proceedings until August 9, 2007 (filed 7/9/07)
• MOTION for Attorney Fees by Plaintiffs (filed 1/4/08)
• MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees (filed 2/27/08)
  • Exhibit - Directive 2006-078
  • Exhibit - Affidavit of Keith Yeazel
  • Exhibit - Comprehensive Chart
• RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees (filed 4/7/08)
  • Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F
• RESPONSE in Support re MOTION for Attorney Fees (filed 4/7/08)
  • Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F
• Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply New date requested 5/5/2008 (filed 4/21/08)
• ORDER granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Replies due by 5/5/2008 (filed 4/24/08)
• REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees (filed 5/5/08)
• ORDER granting Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (entered 9/30/08)
• MOTION for Leave to File Instanter a Supplemental Complaint (filed 10/14/08)
  • [Proposed] Supplemental Complaint
  • Proposed Order
• MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs (filed 10/14/08)
  • Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H
• MOTION to Expedite Discovery by Plaintiffs (filed 10/14/08)
  • Exhibits A, B, C, D, E-1, E-2
• RESPONSE in Opposition to MOTION to Expedite Discovery (filed 10/15/08)
  • Affidavit 1 - Patricia A. Wolfe
  • Affidavit 2 - Patricia A. Wolfe
• Reply in Support of Motion to Expedite Discovery (filed 10/16/08)
  • Exhibit A
• MOTION to Withdraw MOTION for Leave to File Instanter a Supplemental Complaint (filed 10/17/08)
• ANSWER to Complaint by Intervenor State Of Ohio (filed 10/17/08)
• Revised MOTION for Leave to File Instanter a Supplemental Complaint by Plaintiffs (filed 10/17/08)
  • [Proposed] Supplemental Complaint
  • Proposed Order
• ORDER granting Motion to Expedite (entered 10/17/08)
• RESPONSE in Oppositionto MOTION for Leave to File Instanter a Supplemental Complaint (filed 10/17/08)
• Witness List (filed 10/20/08)
• Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Instanter a Supplemental Complaint (filed 10/20/08)
  • Exhibit
• NOTICE of Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction set for Thursday, 10/23/2008, 9:00 AM before Judge Edmund A Sargus (filed 10/20/08)
• Memorandum in Opposition to Preliminary Injunction (filed 10/20/08)
  • Exhibit A
• Exhibit List by Plaintiffs (filed 10/20/08)
• Transcript of Telephone Conference Proceedings held on 10/16/08, before Judge Algenon L. Marbley (filed 10/21/08)
• REPLY to Response to Motion regarding MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (filed 10/22/08)
  • Exhibit A
  • Exhibit B
• MOTION to Quash Subpoena issued by Plaintiffs (filed 10/22/08)
  • Exhibit 1-Subpoena
• MOTION to Quash (filed 10/22/08)
• NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION (filed 10/22/08)
  • Belmont Cty. Deposition
  • Butler County Deposition
  • Clark County Deposition
  • Clermont County Deposition
  • Coshocton County Deposition
  • Cuyahoga County Deposition
  • Franklin County Deposition
  • Greene County Deposition
  • Hamilton County Deposition
  • Logan County Deposition
• NOTICE by Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (filed 10/23/08)
• AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (filed 10/23/08)
• NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel B Miller Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (filed 10/23/08)
• NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION (filed 10/23/08)
  • Lorain County Deposition
  • Lorain County 2 Deposition
  • Lucas County Deposition
  • Madison County Deposition
  • Miami County Deposition
  • Montgomery County Deposition
  • Putnam County Deposition
  • Seneca County Deposition
  • Stark County Deposition
  • Summit County Deposition
  • Warren County Deposition
  • Secretary of State Deposition
• NOTICE by Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (filed 10/23/08)
  • Exhibit 1
  • Exhibit 2
  • Exhibit 3
• AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (filed 10/23/08)
  • Exhibit 1
  • Exhibit 2
  • Exhibit 3
• ORDER adopting and annexing Ohio Secretary of State Directive 2008-101 (filed 10/24/08)
• ORDER granting in part by agreement Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (filed 10/27/08)
• Order of Clarification (filed 10/29/08)
• MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 12/15/2008 (filed 10/30/08)
• MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Defendant Jennifer Brunner (filed 11/4/08)
• MOTION to Intervene and Proposed Order by Intervenor Plaintiff Ohio Democratic Party (filed 11/4/08)
  • Proposed Order
• COMPLAINT by Proposed Intervenor against all defendants, filed by Ohio Democratic Party (filed 11/4/08)
• MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Proposed Order by Intervenor Plaintiff Ohio Democratic Party (filed 11/4/08)
  • Proposed Order
• Supplemental Memorandum Supporting MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Plaintiffs The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 (filed 11/4/08)
• REPLY to Response to Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Defendant Jennifer Brunner (filed 11/4/08)
• ORDER (entered 11/5/08)
• OPINION & ORDER (entered 11/6/08)
• ORDER (Telephonic Status Conference set for 11/14/2008 09:00 AM in teleconference before Algenon L. Marbley) (entered 11/13/08)
• MOTION to Consolidate Cases (filed 11/14/08)
• Supplemental Memorandum Opposing Motion for TRO in Skaggs (filed 11/16/08)
• NOTICE by Defendant Jennifer Brunner of filing answer to the Plaintiffs amended supplemental complaint (filed 11/19/08)
• AMENDED COMPLAINT (filed 11/21/08)
• ANSWER of Defendant Ohio Secretary of State (filed 11/24/08)
• Answer of State of Ohio (filed 11/24/08)
• MOTION to Enforce Judgment (filed 11/26/08)
  • Exhibits A, B, C and D
• Memorandum Contra to Motion to Enforce (filed 11/26/08)
  • Exhibit
• Reply Memo in Support of Motion to Enforce (filed 11/26/08)
  • Exhibit
• ANSWER of State of Ohio to Supplemental Complaint (filed 12/8/08)
• MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 1/12/2009 (filed 12/8/08)
• MOTION to Enjoin the Ohio Supreme Court's Order in State ex rel. Skaggs v. Brunner and Renewed Motion to Enforce the Judgment (filed 12/12/08)
  • Exhibits
• ORDER - denying Motion for Extension of Time for failure to provide evidence of compliance with Local Civil Rule 7.3 (entered 12/16/08)
• MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 1/12/2009 (filed 12/17/08)
  • Proposed Order
• ORDER on Motion for Extension of Time (entered 12/18/08)
• MOTION for Extention of Time; New date requested 1/16/09 (filed 12/30/08)
• ORDER on Motion for Extention of Time (entered 12/31/08)
• BRIEF filed by Plaintiffs NEOCH (filed 1/20/09)
• Memorandum in Reply to Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to NEOCH's Combined Motion to Enjoin the Ohio Supreme Court's Order and Enforce the Judgment (filed 1/27/09)
• Joint Motion of Defendant Brunner and Intervening Defendant State of Ohio for an Extension of Time to File a Response to the Plaintiffs' 1/20/09 Filings (filed 2/13/09)
• Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, Motion for Attorney Fees and Motion for Reconsideration.  Responses due by 2/27. (entered 2/17/09)

State of Ohio's Attempt to Intervene

• Motion to Intervene - State of Ohio (filed 10/27/06)
  • Exhibits to Motion to Intervene
  • Proposed Notice of Defenses
• Notice of Appeal of District Court's Oral Denial of State of Ohio's Motion to Intervene (filed 10/27/06)
• Emergency Motion for Reversal of Denial of Motion to Intervene as of Right (filed 10/27/06)
• Emergency Motion to Intervene filed with Sixth Circuit (filed 10/27/06)
• Combined Opposition of Plaintiffs'-Appellees Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless and Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 to Emergency Motions of "State of Ohio" for (1) Reversal of Denial of Motion to Intervene as of Right; and, (2) to Intervene (filed 10/30/06)
  • Exhibit 1 - Transcript of Intervention Hearing held on 10/27/06

Secretary of State's Appeal to the Sixth Circuit [Filed by Ohio Attorney General without the Secretary of State's participation]

• Emergency Motion of Secretary of State to Stay or Vacate District Court's Orders (filed 10/27/06)
  • Exhibit A to Motion to Stay or Vacate
• Plaintiff-Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (filed 10/28/06)
  • Exhibit 1 to Motion to Dismiss (filed 10/28/06)
• Plaintiff-Appellee's Opposition to Emergency Motion to Stay or Vacate District Court's Orders (filed 10/28/06)
• Secretary of State's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (filed 10/29/06)
• Order granting Stay (entered 10/29/06)
• Amended Order granting stay (entered 10/30/06)
• Text of Sixth Circuit opinion granting stay (entered 10/31/06)
  • Judge McKeague's concurrence (entered 10/31/06)
  • Judge Tarnow's partial concurrence and partial dissent (entered 10/31/06)
• MANDATE issued (entered 12/5/06)

Related Links

• Directive 2006-78 issued by the Ohio Secretary of State regarding voter identification requirements (issued 10/26/06)
  • Nullified, at least in part, by Temporary Restraining Order Ruling
• Directive 2006-79 issued by the Ohio Secretary of State regarding voter identification requirements (issued 10/27/06)
  • Issued pursuant to the District Court's October 26, 2006, oral ruling from the bench
• Directive 2006-84 issued by the Ohio Secretary of State - Consent Order Regarding Absentee Ballots and Election Day Voting Issues (issued 11/2/06)

Related EL@M Stories

• Ohio Provisional Ballots: New Consent Order (11/14/06)
• Ohio Provisional Ballots Back in Court (11/11/06)
• Consent Order in Ohio Voter ID Case (11/2/06)
• Ohio AG Appeals TRO in ID Case (10/27/06)

News Stories

• Advocate faces contempt hearing over e-mail to 88 election boards, The Plain Dealer (11/21/06) [no longer available online]
• Voter ID ruling sets off a flurry, Columbus Dispatch (11/3/06)
• Voter ID law settlement loosens rules, Dayton Daily News (11/3/05)
• Voter ID law stays in effect on election day, Dayton Daily News (11/2/06)
• Court settlement clarifies voter ID law, Cincinnati Post (11/2/06) [no longer available online]
• Compromise relaxes voter ID rules, Toledo Blade (11/2/06)
• Parties settle voter ID lawsuit, Columbus Dispatch (11/2/06)
• Voter ID dispute settled in talks, Akron Beacon Journal (11/2/06) [no longer available online]
• Voter ID dispute settled, Cincinnati Enquirer (11/2/06)
• Vote law challenge settled in U.S. Court, Cleveland Plain Dealer (11/2/06) [no longer available online]
• Deal struck: SS number good enough to ID voters, Canton Repository (11/2/06)
• Ohio suspends voter ID law for absentees, San Jose Mercury News (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Sides reach settlement in suit over Ohio's new voter ID law, Youngstown Vindicator (11/1/06)
• Deal reached on voter ID, Columbus Dispatch (11/1/06)
• Ohio voter ID provisions still in force on election day, Ohio News Network (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Judge mulls voter ID rules, Cincinnati Enquirer (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Voters confused on absentees, Cincinnati Enquirer (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Voter-ID case remains a mess as election nears, Columbus Dispatch (11/1/06)
• Appellate court says voter ID is required, Akron Beacon Journal (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Identification requirement upheld in Court, Cincinnati Enquirer (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Suspension of Ohio's voter ID law lifted, Fort Wayne Journal Gazette (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio voter ID law back in Court today, Cleveland Plain Dealer (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Federal judge holds another hearing on voter ID challenge, Contra Costa Times (11/1/06) [no longer available online]
• Early voters must provide ID, Canton Repository (11/1/06)
• Appeals Court keeps voter ID law; absentee voters must show identification, Ravenna Record Courier (11/1/06)
• Appeals Court keeps Ohio voter ID law, Toledo Blade (11/1/06)
• Appeals Court backs Ohio on voter ID, New York Times (11/1/06)
• Flip-flop in rules flusters officials, Columbus Dispatch (10/31/06)
• ID rulings confuse officials and voters, Cleveland Plain Dealer (10/31/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio counties apply different rules as voter ID battle continues, Canton Repository (10/31/06)
• Counties apply different rules as voter ID law battle continues, Contra Costa Times (10/31/06) [no longer available online]
• Military ID may pose hurdle at voting booth, Dayton Daily News (10/31/06)
• Battle over voter ID continues, Times Bulletin (10/31/06)
• Voter ID rules still in limbo, Akron Beacon Journal (10/31/06) [no longer available online]
• Court stays suspension of Ohio voter ID law, Ohio News Now (10/30/06)
• Court revives voter-ID measure, Columbus Dispatch (10/30/06)
• Voter-ID law back in effect, Akron Beacon Journal (10/30/06) [no longer available online]
• Voter ID rules change a third time in four days, Cleveland Plain Dealer (10/30/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio not alone in voter ID flap, Akron Beacon Journal (10/30/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio absentee voters must continue showing proof of ID, Canton Repository (10/30/06)
• Appellate Court stays suspension of Ohio voter ID law, San Jose Mercury News (10/30/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio voting law is back in action, San Jose Mercury News (10/30/06) [no longer available online]
• 11th-hour vote change anger election officials, Ashtabula Star-Beacon (10/30/06)
• Court revives voter ID measure, Columbus Dispatch (10/30/06)
• Voter ID rules remain in limbo, Columbus Dispatch (10/28/06)
• Ohio makes changes to voter ID law, Palladium-Item (1028/06) [no longer available online]
• Voter ID ruling appealed by Petro, Cleveland Plain Dealer (10/28/06) [no longer available online]
• Disagreement over challenge to voter ID law, Cincinnati Enquirer (10/27/06) [no longer available online]
• Blackwell, Petro differ on voter IDs, Canton Repository (10/28/06)
• Ohio seeks to appeal judge's suspension of voter ID law, Canton Repository (10/27/06)
• Petro to appeal voter-ID ruling over Blackwell's objections, Columbus Dispatch (10/27/06)
• Judge suspends Ohio voter identification law for absentee voting, Toledo Blade (10/27/06) [no longer available online]
• Judge suspends voter-ID directive, Columbus Dispatch (10/27/06)
• Judge suspends part of voter-ID law, Cincinnati Enquirer (10/27/06) [no longer available online]
• Judge blocks ID rule for absentee voters: don't need ID for absentee, Judge rules in voting suit, Cleveland Plain Dealer (10/27/06) [no longer available online]
• Judge blocks voter ID law for absentee ballots, Los Angeles Times (10/27/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio voter ID law suspended, Akron Beacon Journal (10/27/06) [no longer available online]
• Ohio ID law suspended for absentee voting, Washington Post (10/27/06)
• Voter ID ruling appealed by Petro Cleveland Plain Dealer (10/28/06) [no longer available online]
• Voter-ID rules remain in limbo Columbus Dispatch (10/28/06)

Commentaries

• Ohio voter ID law vindicated, Wheeling Intelligencer (11/3/06)
• Consent Order in Voter ID Case, Equal Vote (Dan Tokaji, 11/1/06)
• Voter ID out, Findlay Courier (11/1/06)
• Voter confusion, More Soft Money, Hard Law (11/1/06)
• Our view: Ohio voter ID picture keeps getting uglier, Dayton Daily News (11/1/06)
• Another view: new rules needn't lead to lost votes, Dayton Daily News (11/1/06)
• Voter ID flawed, Toledo Blade (11/1/06)
• Ohio's absentee ballot ID rules weave all over the road, beware crash, Morning Journal (11/1/06)
• Appellate Opinion in ID Case: No Pre-Voting Remedy Needed, Free & Fair (Edward B. Foley, 10/31/06)
• The unknown voter, Cleveland Plain Dealer (10/31/06) [no longer available online]
• Sixth Circuit Stays Ohio TRO, Equal Vote (Dan Tokaji, 10/30/06)
• Stay Application in Ohio ID Case, Equal Vote (Dan Tokaji, 10/28/06)
• Ohio's ID Rules in the Appeals Court: What Next?, Free & Fair (Edward B. Foley, 10/28/06)
• Two Details of TRO in Ohio ID Case, Free & Fair (Edward B. Foley, 10/27/06)
• TRO in Ohio Voter ID Case: Initial Thoughts, Free & Fair (Edward B. Foley, 10/26/06)
• Today's Voter ID Hearing in Ohio, Equal Vote (Dan Tokaji, 10/26/06)
• ID Disparities & Post-Voting Review of Provisional or Absentee Ballots, Free & Fair
  (Edward B. Foley, 10/25/06)
• Ohio Voter ID Lawsuit, Equal Vote (Dan Tokaji, 10/24/06)

Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.

The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631