OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

NAACP v. Husted

Case Information

Date Filed: May 1, 2014
State: Ohio
Issue: Early Voting
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:14-cv-404); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Case 14-3877)

Issue:

Whether Ohio's reduction of early voting days and elimination of same-day registration violates Equal Protection and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Status:

Complaint filed 5/1/2014. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/2/14. Answer filed 5/23/14. Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 6/30/14.Plaintiffs' Filing of Amended Declaration filed 7/1/14. Order filed 7/2/14. Ohio General Assembly's Motion to Intervene filed 7/11/14. Order denying Ohio General Assembly's Motion to Intervene filed 7/3014. Emergency Motion for Reconsideration as to Motion to Intervene filed 7/30/14. Order denying Motion for Reconsideration filed 7/31/14. Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 9/4/14. Sixth Circuit order expediting review filed 9/11/14. Sixth Circuit order denying stay pending appeal filed 9/12/14. Appellants' Brief filed 9/15/14. Appellees' Brief filed 9/19/14. Opinion affirming District Court filed 9/24/14. Emergency Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed 9/24/14. Appellees' response to emergency petition filed 9/25/14. Emergency Application of Husted and DeWine for Stay filed 9/25/14 in U.S. Supreme Court. Emergency Application of Ohio General Assembly filed in U.S. Supreme Court 9/25/14. Response of NAACP et al filed 9/27/14. Reply of Husted and DeWine filed 9/28/14. Order Granting Stay filed 9/29/14. Ohio General Assembly's Third Motion to Intervene filed 11/10/14. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Intervene filed 11/25/14. Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Intervene filed 11/26/14. Circuit Court's Order vacating and remanding order denying motion to intervene filed 12/19/14. Order granting Motion to Intervene filed 1/14/15. Settlement agreement filed 4/17/15. Plaintiffs' Stipulation of Dismissal filed 4/17/15.

 

District Court Documents

 

Court of Appeals Documents (Motion to Intervene)

 

Court of Appeals Documents

Supreme Court Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Missing Link in Gerrymandering Jurisprudence

Edward B. Foley

The key advance is the ability to identify whether a redistricting map is an extreme outlier in the degree of its partisan bias.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

A path through the thicket the First Amendment right of association

A post written by Professor Dan Tokaji for SCOTUSblog during their Summer Symposium on Gill v. Whitford was reprinted on ACSblog.

“A constitutional standard for partisan gerrymandering is the holy grail of election law. For decades, scholars and jurists have struggled to find a manageable standard for claims of excessive partisanship in drawing district lines," Tokaji writes. "Most of these efforts have focused on the equal protection clause. But as Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested in Vieth v. Jubelirer, the First Amendment provides a firmer doctrinal basis for challenging partisan gerrymandering.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Texas\' Request for Stay in Redistricting Case

In two 5-4 votes, the U.S. Supreme Court granted stays in a Texas redistricting case involving Congressional and state house questions, putting on hold the district court\'s orders for the Texas legislature to redraw certain district lines. The stays will be in place until the Supreme Court rules on Texas\' appeal, likely next year. The case is Perez v. Abbott.

more info & analysis...