OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Miller v. Lieutenant Governor Craig Campbell, et. al.

Case Information

Date Filed: November 9, 2010
State: Alaska
Issue: Election 2010
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska (Case 3:10-cv-00252); State of Alaska Superior Court, Fourth District (Case 4FA-10-3151)

Issue:

Whether the Defendants are in violation of the Elections Clause of the US Constitution prohibiting the enacting of election provisions inconsistent with legislative mandates, and in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution regarding the policy of attempting to divine the “intent of the voter” from write-in ballots.

Status:

Motion to file Amended Complaint filed 12/27/10.  Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion in Opposition to Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion to Expedite Order to Lift Preliminary Injunction filed 12/27/10.  Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint (as amended) entered 12/29/10.

District Court Documents

State Superior Court Documents

State Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of X-Rays, CT Scans, and Gerrymanders

Edward B. Foley

Progress in the detection of malignant redistricting.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Ranked-choice voting: A better way or chaos?

Professor Edward Foley’s book, “Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States” was quoted in The Ellsworth American, in an article about ranked-choice voting in Maine.

Plurality language was added to Maine’s Constitution in 1880 after none of the candidates for governor in the election of 1879 received a majority vote.

“After this ordeal, the state eliminated the requirement that a gubernatorial candidate win a majority in order to win the office outright; instead, a plurality would suffice,” Foley writes.
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Texas\' Request for Stay in Redistricting Case

In two 5-4 votes, the U.S. Supreme Court granted stays in a Texas redistricting case involving Congressional and state house questions, putting on hold the district court\'s orders for the Texas legislature to redraw certain district lines. The stays will be in place until the Supreme Court rules on Texas\' appeal, likely next year. The case is Perez v. Abbott.

more info & analysis...