OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Miller v. Lieutenant Governor Craig Campbell, et. al.

Case Information

Date Filed: November 9, 2010
State: Alaska
Issue: Election 2010
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska (Case 3:10-cv-00252); State of Alaska Superior Court, Fourth District (Case 4FA-10-3151)

Issue:

Whether the Defendants are in violation of the Elections Clause of the US Constitution prohibiting the enacting of election provisions inconsistent with legislative mandates, and in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution regarding the policy of attempting to divine the “intent of the voter” from write-in ballots.

Status:

Motion to file Amended Complaint filed 12/27/10.  Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion in Opposition to Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion to Expedite Order to Lift Preliminary Injunction filed 12/27/10.  Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint (as amended) entered 12/29/10.

District Court Documents

State Superior Court Documents

State Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Gerrymandering Is Headed Back to the Supreme Court

Professor Edward Foley was requoted in Mother Jones about a gerrymandering case in Wisconsin on its way to the Supreme Court. Other legal actions on partisan gerrymandering in Maryland and in North Carolina may be bound for the Supreme Court as well.

While previous Supreme Court cases have noted that partisan gerrymanders are “incompatible with democratic principles,” The New York Times originally reported, the court has never officially struck a case down. While it remains unseen how the Supreme Court will rule in the upcoming cases, a 2004 ruling from a previous gerrymandering case could play a pivotal role in how the court stands in the future. 

“The ordered working of our Republic, and of the democratic process, depends on a sense of decorum and restraint in all branches of government, and in the citizenry itself,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in 2004. Kennedy’s statement is “the most important line” in the decision, Foley told The New York Times, adding,  “He’s going to look at what’s going on in North Carolina as the complete absence of that. I think that helps the plaintiffs in any of these cases.”


 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider a gerrymandering case involving Wisconsin state legislative districts. The court also granted a request by the state to temporarily block the lower court\'s decision until the appeal is resolved. The case is Gill v. Whitford.

more info & analysis...