OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Miller v. Lieutenant Governor Craig Campbell, et. al.

Case Information

Date Filed: November 9, 2010
State: Alaska
Issue: Election 2010
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska (Case 3:10-cv-00252); State of Alaska Superior Court, Fourth District (Case 4FA-10-3151)

Issue:

Whether the Defendants are in violation of the Elections Clause of the US Constitution prohibiting the enacting of election provisions inconsistent with legislative mandates, and in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution regarding the policy of attempting to divine the “intent of the voter” from write-in ballots.

Status:

Motion to file Amended Complaint filed 12/27/10.  Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion in Opposition to Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion to Expedite Order to Lift Preliminary Injunction filed 12/27/10.  Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint (as amended) entered 12/29/10.

District Court Documents

State Superior Court Documents

State Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

6th Circuit Reverses District Court, Permits Elimination of Golden Week in Ohio

In a 2-1 opinion released today, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the District Court, which had blocked the Ohio General Assembly\'s elimination of a \"Golden Week\" in which voters could both register and cast their votes. The Sixth Circuit disagreed with the District Court\'s determination that Ohio\'s election laws violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. The case is Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted.

more info & analysis...