OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Miller v. Lieutenant Governor Craig Campbell, et. al.

Case Information

Date Filed: November 9, 2010
State: Alaska
Issue: Election 2010
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska (Case 3:10-cv-00252); State of Alaska Superior Court, Fourth District (Case 4FA-10-3151)

Issue:

Whether the Defendants are in violation of the Elections Clause of the US Constitution prohibiting the enacting of election provisions inconsistent with legislative mandates, and in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution regarding the policy of attempting to divine the “intent of the voter” from write-in ballots.

Status:

Motion to file Amended Complaint filed 12/27/10.  Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion in Opposition to Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/27/10.  Motion to Expedite Order to Lift Preliminary Injunction filed 12/27/10.  Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint (as amended) entered 12/29/10.

District Court Documents

State Superior Court Documents

State Supreme Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Publication of new BALLOT BATTLES book

Edward B. Foley

I'm delighted that Oxford University Press has published my new book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States. I've collected links to last week's blogging related to the book's release. 

more commentary...

In the News

David  Stebenne

Clinton, Sanders and the changing face of the Democratic Party

Professor David Stebenne wrote an op-ed for The Conversation describing how a recent debate between Democratic Party presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders highlighted changes in the Democratic Party over the past half-century.

“Last week’s debate in New Hampshire between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders over who is the “real progressive” said a lot about how they and the Democratic Party have changed over the past half-century,” Stebenne said.

“When Clinton and Sanders first came of age politically during the mid-1960s, neither was a natural fit for the Democrats as the party was then.

“Taking a look at how these two very different people and the party they now want to lead have evolved can help clarify the philosophical divide on display in the Democratic Party today.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

New state voting laws face first presidential election test

more info & analysis...