OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

McComish v. Bennett

Case Information

Date Filed: November 29, 2010
State: Arizona
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. Supreme Court (Case 10-239); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Case 10-15166); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Case 10-15165)

Issue:

Whether Arizona campaing finance law violates the first and fourteenth amendments.

Status:

Opinion Issued  6/27/11. Reply Brief of Petitioner McCommish filed 3/15/11. Reply Brief of Petitioner Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC filed 3/16/11. Motion of Acting-Solicitor General to Argue as Amicus Curie Granted entered 3/18/11. Motion of Petitioners for Divided Argument Denied entered 3/18/11.  Case Argued 3/28/11.

Supreme Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Ohio voters may change way Congress lines are drawn

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in the Dayton Daily News about the potential outcomes of several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that will address partisan gerrymandering.

“One direction is the court basically abandoning any role to try to police excessive partisanship in these maps,” Foley said. “The other fork in the road would take the federal judiciary down the path of being something of a police officer on this issue.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...