Last Updated: September 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM
League of Women Voters v. Rokita
Case Information
Date Filed: June 20, 2008
State: Indiana
Issue: Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: Marion County Superior Court (Case 49D13-0806-PL-027627); Indiana Court of Appeals (Case 49A02-0901-CV-00040); Indiana Supreme Court (Case 49S02-1001-CV-00050)
Issue:
Whether Indiana's Voter ID law is unconstitutional under provisions of the Indiana State Constitution.
Status:
Oral argument 3/4/10. Final Opinion Affirming the Decision of the Trial Court and Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss entered 6/30/10. Opinion Certified on 8/13/10.
Supreme Court Documents
- Appellants' Petition to Transfer
(filed 10/19/09) - Appellee's Petition to Transfer
(filed 10/19/09) - Brief of Professors Madison, Levinson, and Etchson as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants
filed (11/9/09) - Brief of Amicus Curiae League of Women Voters of the United States
(filed 11/9/09) - Brief of Amicus Curiae AARP and National Senior Citizens Law Center
(filed 11/9/09) - Brief of Amicus Curiae Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
(filed 11/9/09) - Brief of Lonna Rae Atkeson, Matt A. Barreto, Lorraine C. Minnite, Jonathan Nagler, Stephen A. Nuno and Gabriel Ramon Sanchez as Amicus Curiae
(filed 11/9/09) - Brief of Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union and Southern Coalition for Social Justice
(filed 11/9/09) - Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Educational Fund, Inc. as Amicus Curiae
(filed 11/9/09) - Appellants' Response to Petition to Transfer
(filed 11/9/09) - Response to Appellants' Petition to Transfer
(filed 11/9/09) - Reply in Support of Petition to Transfer
(filed 11/18/09) - Appellants' Reply in Support of Petition to Transfer
(filed 11/24/09) - Order Granting Transfer
(entered 1/25/10) - Oral Argument scheduled for March 4, 2010
- Court Issued Opinion Affirming the Decision of the Trial Court and Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(entered 6/30/10) - Opinion Certified on August 13, 2010
Court of Appeals Documents
- Notice of Appeal (filed 1/15/09)
- Appellants Case Summary (filed 1/15/09)
- Brief of Appellants
(filed 3/2/09)
- Appendix
- Appellee's Petition for Permission to File a Belated Brief (filed 4/3/09)
- Appellee's Motion to Filed a Belated Brief (filed 4/6/09)
- Appellee's Verified Motion to File Belated Brief of Appellee and Motion to File Belated Brief of Appellee Instater are GRANTED (entered 4/15/09)
- Clerk of Court is directed to file the Appellee's brief as of the date of this order
- Appellant's reply brief, if any shall be filed within 15 days of this order
- Appellant's reply brief received, awaiting permission to file (5/1/09)
- Order to File Reply Brief entered (5/12/09)
- Appellant's Additional Citation of Authority
(filed 7/17/09) - Appellee's Response to Appellants' Statement of Additional Authorities (filed 8/14/09)
- Opinion -- Reversing trial court and Remanding with instructions
(entered 9/17/09)
Trial Court Documents
NOTICE: The electronic docket for this case is not freely available to the public. Filings in this case are not being monitored on a daily basis. Select documents will be added to this page when possible.
- Complaint
(filed 6/20/08) - Motion for Change of Judge
(filed 6/23/08) - Order Granting Motion for Change of Judge (filed 7/2/08)
- Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 7/14/08) - Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 7/14/08) - Response to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 7/29/08) - Motion for Expedited Status Conference
(filed 7/29/08) - Amended Complaint
(filed 7/29/08) - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 9/15/08)
- Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 10/17/08) - Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 12/17/08)
Related EL@M Stories
- State's voter ID law target of another suit, Indianapolis Star, 6/21/08




Commentary
A Poster Child for Dysfunctional Districting
Daniel P. Tokaji
Fifty years ago next month, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Baker v. Carr (1962), inaugurating the “reapportionment revolution” which led to the redrawing of legislative districts across the country. This milestone provides the opportunity to reflect not only on what has been accomplished, but also on what still needs to be done.
more commentary...