OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

LULAC of Texas v. State of Texas

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: May 9, 2008 / March 11, 2009
State: Texas
Issues: Selection of Presidential Electors, Vote Dillution
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case 5:08-cv-00389); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit (Case 08-50581)

Issue:

Whether the Texas Democratic Primary process unlawfully undervalues the votes of Latino voters.

Status:

Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) filed 6/9/08.  Appellant filed brief on 7/30/08.  Appellee filed briefs on 8/26/08 and 9/15/08.  Reply brief filed by Appellant on 9/30/08.  Oral Argument scheduled for 2/2/09 on 12/16/08. Oral Argument heard 2/4/09. Judgment entered and filed 2/17/09.  Mandate issued 3/11/09.

Appellate Court Documents

District Court Documents

Related Links

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

How states can fix the Electoral College and prevent future Trumps

An op-ed written by Professor Edward Foley about repairing the Electoral College was published in USA Today.

“The imperative is to prevent another president who wins the White House without really winning the support of the electorates in the states that determine the outcome,” Foley writes. “The Founding Fathers would see that as a subversion of the Electoral College system. So should we.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Ohio ADA Case Alleging Discrimination Against Blind Voters

In an opinion released today, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court dismissing a lawsuit alleging that Ohio\'s absentee voter system discriminates against blind voters. According to the panel, the district court accepted Ohio Secretary of State John Husted\'s \"fundamental alteration\" defense without any evidentiary support. The case, Hindel v. Husted, was remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

more info & analysis...