OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

LULAC of Texas v. State of Texas

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: May 9, 2008 / March 11, 2009
State: Texas
Issues: Selection of Presidential Electors, Vote Dillution
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case 5:08-cv-00389); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit (Case 08-50581)

Issue:

Whether the Texas Democratic Primary process unlawfully undervalues the votes of Latino voters.

Status:

Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) filed 6/9/08.  Appellant filed brief on 7/30/08.  Appellee filed briefs on 8/26/08 and 9/15/08.  Reply brief filed by Appellant on 9/30/08.  Oral Argument scheduled for 2/2/09 on 12/16/08. Oral Argument heard 2/4/09. Judgment entered and filed 2/17/09.  Mandate issued 3/11/09.

Appellate Court Documents

District Court Documents

Related Links

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Trump Calls for Voter Fraud Probe: A Look at Past Inquiries

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in Voice of America about President Donald Trump’s plans to launch a “major investigation” into voter fraud. Trump claims he lost the popular vote because as many as 5 million non-U.S. citizens may have voted illegally.

“As I understand the latest allegations, somewhere between 3 to 5 million improper ballots were cast this past November nationwide, which Trump claims accounts for why Hillary Clinton won the popular vote,” Foley said. “Even if there were 3 to 5 million invalid votes nationwide, we can’t jump to the conclusion that the election result was tainted, because we don’t know who they voted for.”

The odds of a non-U.S. citizen successfully casting a ballot are “extremely low, extraordinarily low,” according to Foley. Instances in which invalid ballots are cast or when voters’ names appear on multiple state voter rolls also don’t necessarily indicate voter fraud either, he added.

“Just because a ballot was cast that was invalid, which is a problem, doesn’t necessarily mean there was a conspiracy to commit voter fraud,” Foley said. “Fraud is a pejorative term that implies intentional deception and manipulation, as opposed to there being mistakes in voter registration lists.”
 


 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Rules that Ohio Voter Services Website Violates ADA

A U.S. District Judge issued an opinion finding that the Ohio Secretary of State\'s voter services website violates Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act because it is not accessible to visually impaired Ohio voters. Judge George C. Smith ordered Secretary of State John Husted to make the site more accessible by September 29, 2017. As discussed in the opinion, the information on the voter services site does not meet established standards of accessibility for visually impaired voters who use screen reading software. The case is Hindel v. Husted.

more info & analysis...