OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Kohls v. Martin

Case Information

Date Filed: April 16, 2014
State: Arkansas
Issue: Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas Sixth Division (Case 60CV-14-1495); Supreme Court of Arkansas (Case CV-14-462)

Issue:

Whether state statute requiring voters to provide proof of identity before voting violates the Arkansas constitution.  

Status:

Petition filed 4/16/14. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 4/22/14. Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed 4/25/14. Defendants' Response to Motion to Quash filed 4/28/14. Defendant Martin's Answer filed 5/2/14. Defendants' Answer filed 5/9/14. Order on Preliminary Injunction filed 5/23/14. Defendants' Notice of Appeal filed 5/23/14. Appellant's Brief filed 7/3/14. Separate Appellants Brief filed 7/7/14. Appellee's Brief filed 8/11/14. Opinion finding that Voter ID law violates Arkansas Constitution filed 10.15.14.

Supreme Court Documents

Circuit Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Pro-DeWine group to bring dark money to 2018 Ohio governor's race

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in Cleveland.com about Securing Ohio’s Future, an advocacy group that isn’t required to disclose its donors or expenses.

"Taking a look at their website, it certainly appears a big part of their purpose is to support the Republican gubernatorial ticket," Tokaji said. "Does that mean they're in violation of the law? I can't say that for sure based on what I've seen, and based on the murkiness of the legal standard, but it's certainly pushing the envelope."
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Maryland Redistricting Case

The U.S. Supreme Court recently added the Maryland redistricting case of Benisek v. Lamone to the merits docket. The court postponed consideration of the jurisdiction question until hearing the case on the merits.

more info & analysis...