OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

Case Information

Date Filed: November 21, 2010
State: Ohio
Issues: Election 2010, Recount Resources
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 1:10-cv-00820); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (Case 10-4481); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (Case 12-3266, 12-3224)

Issue:

Whether the Hamilton County Board of Elections should count the provisional votes of citizens who voted at the wrong precinct solely due to poll worker error.

Status:

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed 8/30/11. Response to Motion to dismiss filed 9/08/11. Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed 9/22/11. Judgment and Order Enjoining Board From Rejecting Ballots filed 2/8/12. Oral Argument set for 7/25/12. Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal filed 7/11/12.

See also State of Ohio ex rel. John W. Painter and John Williams v. Jennifer L. Brunner, Secretary of the State of Ohio, and the Board of Elections of Hamilton County, Ohio

District Court Documents

District Court Documents (on remand)

Appellate Court Documents (first appeal)

Appellate Court Documents (second appeal)

Supreme Court Documents

News Stories

Other Documents

  • Ohio Secretary of State Letter "Concerning Whether to Take All Necessary Steps to Appeal the Decision of the Federal Appellate Court in Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Election" PDF (dated 2/2/11)

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Friday round-up

A blog post written by Professor Edward Foley for ElectionLaw@Moritz about the U.S. Supreme Court case Benisek v. Lamone was requoted in SCOTUSblog. 

 

“[There] are reasons to be skeptical, at least early in the stages of the intellectual inquiry, that there would be a single ‘grand unified theory of partisan gerrymandering’ under the U.S. Constitution,” Foley writes. 


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Federal Court Finds Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina

A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina released a lengthy opinion Tuesday finding that North Carolina\'s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.

more info & analysis...