OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

Case Information

Date Filed: November 21, 2010
State: Ohio
Issues: Election 2010, Recount Resources
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 1:10-cv-00820); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (Case 10-4481); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (Case 12-3266, 12-3224)

Issue:

Whether the Hamilton County Board of Elections should count the provisional votes of citizens who voted at the wrong precinct solely due to poll worker error.

Status:

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed 8/30/11. Response to Motion to dismiss filed 9/08/11. Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed 9/22/11. Judgment and Order Enjoining Board From Rejecting Ballots filed 2/8/12. Oral Argument set for 7/25/12. Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal filed 7/11/12.

See also State of Ohio ex rel. John W. Painter and John Williams v. Jennifer L. Brunner, Secretary of the State of Ohio, and the Board of Elections of Hamilton County, Ohio

District Court Documents

District Court Documents (on remand)

Appellate Court Documents (first appeal)

Appellate Court Documents (second appeal)

Supreme Court Documents

News Stories

Other Documents

  • Ohio Secretary of State Letter "Concerning Whether to Take All Necessary Steps to Appeal the Decision of the Federal Appellate Court in Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Election" PDF (dated 2/2/11)

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

White House drops Obama-era discrimination claim against Texas voter ID law

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in The Christian Science Monitor in an article about how the Trump administration dropped a discrimination claim against a Texas voter ID law. Viewed as one of the strictest voting requirements in the country by voting rights advocates, the law required voters to show one of seven valid forms of ID.

A federal appeals court ruled last year that the law disproportionately impacted minorities and those living in poverty. The court required the state to adjust its requirements before the general election. According to court testimony, Hispanic voters were twice as likely to lack proper ID under the law, while black voters were three times as likely.

“Voting litigation is increasing, not decreasing,” Foley said. “The main impression … is that when a law looks like it’s engaging in outright disenfranchisement of a valid voter, even conservative judges have been stopping that. [But] the judiciary is more tolerant with state legislatures adjusting issues of convenience and accessibility, if the adjustment is not outright disenfranchisement.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

District Judge Dismisses Georgia Voter Rolls Case

In an order released late Friday, U.S. District Judge Timothy Batten dismissed a lawsuit filed against Georgia\'s Secretary of State by the advocacy organization Common Cause, which alleged that Georgia unlawfully removed voters from registration lists preceding the 2016 Presidential election. The case is Common Cause v. Kemp.

more info & analysis...