OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

Franken v. Pawlenty

Case Information

Date Filed / Ended: January 13, 2009 / March 6, 2009
State: Minnesota
Issues: MN Senate race 2008, Election Contest, Recount Resources
Courts that Heard this Case: Minnesota Supreme Court (Case A09-0064)

Issue:

Whether Senate candidate Al Franken is entitled to receive an election certificate signed by the governor and secretary of state while an election contest brought by his opponent, Norm Coleman, is ongoing.

Status:

Petition filed by Franken on 1/13.  Norm Coleman filed motion to intervene 1/14. Brief of Al Franken filed 1/20. Respondents' Brief filed 1/26. Intervenor's Brief filed 1/26. Al Franken's Reply Brief filed 1/28. Opinion entered 3/6.

Minnesota Supreme Court Documents

MN Courts Document Page

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Columbus City Council Will See Some Reforms, But Not For Another Six Years

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in WOSU about changes to Columbus City Council that will stem from the passage of Issue 3.

 

“In a city where one political party is dominant, it makes sense to think about the citizen's commission to take it out of the hands of the politicians,” Foley said. “Because if you leave it in the hands of the politicians, it’s hard to get balance between the two parties.”


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Decides Wisconsin and Maryland Gerrymandering Cases on Procedural Grounds

In opinions issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two gerrymandering cases on procedural grounds. In an opinion in the Wisconsin case of Gill v. Whitford, the Court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the legislature\'s redistricting plan. In an opinion in the Maryland case of Benisek v. Lamone, the Court determined that the District Court was within its discretion in denying preliminary relief to the plaintiffs challenging the legislature\'s redistricting plan.

more info & analysis...