OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Fitrakis v. Husted (federal court)

Case Information

Date Filed: November 5, 2012
State: Ohio
Issue: Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case 2:12-cv-01015)

Issue:

Whether Ohio's use of certain software for electronic voting machines violates plaintiff's rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983; whether Secretary of State Husted, as a public official, spent public funds without authorization.

Status:

Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Filed 11/5/12. Hearing set for 11/6/12. Motion for Restraining Order denied 11/6/12. Voluntary Dismissal Notice filed 11/20/12.

 

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Columbus City Council Will See Some Reforms, But Not For Another Six Years

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in WOSU about changes to Columbus City Council that will stem from the passage of Issue 3.

 

“In a city where one political party is dominant, it makes sense to think about the citizen's commission to take it out of the hands of the politicians,” Foley said. “Because if you leave it in the hands of the politicians, it’s hard to get balance between the two parties.”


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

In 5-4 Decision, U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Ohio Voter Purge Procedure

In a 5-4 opinion issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Ohio\'s system of purging inactive voters from the rolls. The case is Husted v. Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute.

more info & analysis...