OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Favors v. Cuomo

Case Information

Date Filed: November 17, 2011
State: New York
Issue: Redistricting
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case 1:11-cv-05632 )

Issue:

Whether New York's redistricting procedure violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14th Amendment, among other provisions.

Status:

Complaint filed 11/17/11. Motion to Dismiss Denied 5/16/12. Answer to Cross Claim filed 6/18/12. Assembly Majority's Motion for Summary Judgment on Equal Population claims and section 2 claims filed 6/29/12. Stipulation of Dismissal of Voting Rights Act Section 2 claims against Assembly defendants filed 12/18/12. Final Judgment Order filed 11/5/13. Amended Judgment Order filed 11/8/13. Order granting Motion for Summary Judgment filed 5/22/14. Plaintiff-Intervenors' First Motion for Reconsideration filed 6/4/14. Defendants' Objection to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation filed 6/6/14. Order denying Motion for Reconsideration filed 7/25/14. Order adopting Report and Recommendation filed 8/14/14. Order closing Case filed 8/14/14. Order that Clerk enter Judgment filed 9/5/14. Clerk's Order in favor of the Senate majority filed 9/11/14.

District Court Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Columbus City Council Will See Some Reforms, But Not For Another Six Years

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in WOSU about changes to Columbus City Council that will stem from the passage of Issue 3.

 

“In a city where one political party is dominant, it makes sense to think about the citizen's commission to take it out of the hands of the politicians,” Foley said. “Because if you leave it in the hands of the politicians, it’s hard to get balance between the two parties.”


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Decides Wisconsin and Maryland Gerrymandering Cases on Procedural Grounds

In opinions issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two gerrymandering cases on procedural grounds. In an opinion in the Wisconsin case of Gill v. Whitford, the Court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the legislature\'s redistricting plan. In an opinion in the Maryland case of Benisek v. Lamone, the Court determined that the District Court was within its discretion in denying preliminary relief to the plaintiffs challenging the legislature\'s redistricting plan.

more info & analysis...