OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

LULAC v. Deininger

Case Information

Date Filed: February 23, 2012
State: Wisconsin
Issue: Voter ID
Current Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Case 2:12-cv-00185)

Issue:

Whether Wisconsin's voter ID law violates the right to vote of African-Americans and Latinos.

Status:

Complaint filed 2/23/12. Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 4/23/12. Trial Postponed until Spring 2013. Trial held in November 2013. Post hearing briefs due 12/20/13. Defendant Post-Trial brief filed 12/22/13. Plaintiff Post-Trial Brief filed 12/22/13. Decision and Order striking down voter ID law filed 4/29/14. Notice of Appeal 5/12/14. Defendants' Motion to Stay Permanent Injunction filed 5/12/14. Appellants' Brief filed 6/23/14. Order denying Motion to file Amicus Curiae filed 7/21/14. Frank Appellees' Brief filed 723/14. LULAC's Brief filed 7/23/14. 7th Circuit order granting stay filed 9/12/14. Emergency Petition for Rehearing filed 9/16/14. Appellant's Response to Petition for Rehearing filed 9/23/14. Order denying Motion for Rehearing filed 9/26/14. Opinions filed 9/30/14. Emergency Application to Vacate Stay filed in SCOTUS 10/2/14. Opinion reversing District Court filed 10/6/14. Memorandum in opposition to SCOTUS emergency application filed 10/6/14. Emergency Motion to Stay Seventh Circuit's Order filed 10/8/14. SCOTUS order granting application to vacate stay filed 10/9/14. 7th Circuit opinion on request to rehear en banc filed 10/10/14.

 

Appeal consolidated with Frank v. Walker for purposes of briefing and disposition.

See related Wisconsin voter ID cases: Frank v. Walker, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin v. Walker, and Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP v. Walker

District Court Documents


Circuit Court of Appeals Documents

U.S. Supreme Court Documents

Related News

Commentary

In the News

David  Stebenne

Can Kasich win all 88 Ohio counties?

Professor David Stebenne was quoted in an Ohio Watchdog article about the possibility of Governor John Kasich winning all 88 Ohio counties in his re-election bid.

“It’s really hard to do,” he said. “As popular as the governor is and as weak as his opponent is, I doubt he’ll carry all 88 (counties).”

Stebenne said Ohio has some unusual counties, which tend to be really Democratic or really Republican.

He said a good example was the election of 1956, when President Dwight Eisenhower carried 87 of 88 Ohio counties.

“He lost one of the Appalachian counties — a poor county where the residents tend to vote Democratic no matter what,” Stebenne said. “There was even some humorous discussion in the Oval Office about that one county.”

Glenn and Voinovich were “the two most popular candidates in modern history,” he added, “and they each only did it once. While Kasich is popular, he really doesn’t have the broad appeal that these two did.”

Stebenne said that both Voinovich and Kasich come from communities that tend to be more Democratic in voter registration, but that Kasich’s first race for governor was more divisive than the races for Voinovich.

“Voinovich had electoral success in Cleveland and as governor because he was able to persuade Democrats to vote Republican,” he said. “Glenn had national appeal across party lines.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

10th Circuit Reverses District Court on KS and AZ Proof of Citizenship Requirement

The Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued an opinion today in Kobach v. EAC, rejecting the proof of citizenship requirement imposed by Kansas and Arizona in the voter registration process.

more info & analysis...