OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Conservative Party of New York State, et al., v. New York State Board of Elections, et al.

Case Information

Date Filed: September 14, 2010
State: New York
Issues: Voting Technology, Vote Dillution
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:10-cv-06923)

Issue:

Whether New York's policy of, when a voter selects the same candidate multiple times under multiple party affiliations, counting only the vote for the first party selected, and thus depriving the second party of credit for receiving a vote on their party, without notice to the voter, is unconstitutional.

Status:

Consent Decree Dismissing Case entered 9/8/11. Oral Argument Held on Motion to Dismiss 1/31/11.  Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Law on Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed 2/3/11.  Order Denying Motion to Dismiss entered 2/10/11. Civil Case Management Plan entered 3/1/11. Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Settlement entered 4/7/11.  Order and Opinion Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5/10/11. Consent Decree Dismiss Case filed (9/08/11)

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Columbus City Council Will See Some Reforms, But Not For Another Six Years

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in WOSU about changes to Columbus City Council that will stem from the passage of Issue 3.

 

“In a city where one political party is dominant, it makes sense to think about the citizen's commission to take it out of the hands of the politicians,” Foley said. “Because if you leave it in the hands of the politicians, it’s hard to get balance between the two parties.”


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

In 5-4 Decision, U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Ohio Voter Purge Procedure

In a 5-4 opinion issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Ohio\'s system of purging inactive voters from the rolls. The case is Husted v. Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute.

more info & analysis...